The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer
Abstract
In Brief Purpose: To study the results of an ocular response analyzer (ORA) to determine the biomechanical properties of the cornea and their relationship to intraocular pressure (IOP). Setting: Reichert Inc., Depew, New York, USA. Methods: The ORA (Reichert) makes 2 essentially instantaneous applanation measurements that permit determination of corneal and IOP effects. Results: Measurements of several populations indicate that corneal hysteresis, a biomechanical measure, varied over a dynamic range of 1.8 to 14.6 mm Hg and was only weakly correlated with corneal thickness (r2 = 0.12); this is related to the observation that some subjects with relatively thick corneas have less-than-average corneal hysteresis. Corneal hysteresis changes diurnally, presumably as a result of hydration changes. Keratoconus, Fuchs' dystrophy, and post-LASIK patients demonstrated low corneal hysteresis. Conclusion: The corneal hysteresis biomechanical measure may prove valuable for qualification and predictions of outcomes of refractive surgery and in other cases in which corneal biomechanics are important. The ocular response analyzer determines biomechanical properties of the cornea and the IOP by making 2 essentially instantaneous applanation measurements that permit determination of corneal and pressure effects. Measurements indicate that a new corneal biomechanical measure called corneal hysteresis varies over a dynamic range and is only weakly correlated with corneal thickness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human Corneal Thickness and Its Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measures
Doughty, M. J., & Zaman, M. L. (2000) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00110-7 · Cited by 1,362
Cited by
Corneal Collagen Crosslinking: A Systematic Review
Sorkin, N., & Varssano, D. (2014) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000357979 · Cited by 1,918
Pepose, J. S., Feigenbaum, S. K., Qazi, M. A., Sanderson, J. P., & Roberts, C. J. (2007) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.036 · Cited by 369
Surveillance for ocular hypertension: an evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.
Burr, J., Botello-Pinzon, P., Takwoingi, Y., Hernández, R., Vazquez-Montes, M., Elders, A., Asaoka, R., Banister, K., van der Schoot, J., Fraser, C., et al. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16290 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Luce, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 156-162
- ISSN
- 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
- 0886-3350
- OpenAlex
- W2070496003
- Cited by
- 1,311
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044
- The paper
- Luce, D. A. (2005). Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.