The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of routine cell culture for respiratory viruses among children with a negative multiplex RT-PCR result
Open accessAbstract
Background Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the reference standard for respiratory virus testing. However, cell culture may still have added value in identifying viruses not detected by PCR.Objectives We aimed to estimate the yield and clinical impact of routine respiratory virus culture among children with a negative PCR result.Study design A retrospective cohort study was performed from Jan. 2013 to Sept. 2015. Respiratory samples from hospitalized or immunocompromised patients <18years old were routinely inoculated on traditional tube cell culture monolayers if they tested negative by a PCR assay for 12 respiratory viruses. We studied patients with a respiratory specimen negative by PCR and positive by culture. Duplicates and samples of sold services were excluded. Data on demographics, clinical history, laboratory findings, and patient management were collected from patients' charts. Descriptive and multivariate statistics were performed.Results Overall, 4638 PCR-negative samples were inoculated in cell culture. Of those, 196 (4.2%) were cell culture positive, and 144 met study inclusion criteria. Most subjects (81.9%) were hospitalized. Mean age was 2.4±3.4years. The viruses most frequently isolated were cytomegalovirus (33.3%) and enteroviruses (19.4%). Cell culture results prompted a change in management in 5 patients (3.5%), all of whom had acyclovir initiated for localized HSV-1 infection. Four of these had skin or mucosal lesions that could be sampled to establish a diagnosis.Conclusion In children, routine viral culture on respiratory specimens that were negative by PCR has low yield and minimal clinical impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- AlGhounaim, M., Xiao, Y., Caya, C., & Papenburg, J.
- Affiliations
- Montreal Children's Hospital (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Papenburg, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Virology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 107-109
- ISSN
- 1386-6532 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7106410
- OpenAlex
- W2741676432
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Virology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Literature Analysis and Criticism
- Keywords
- multiplex RT-PCR, diagnostic yield, cytomegalovirus, enterovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1, acyclovir, hospitalized children, immunocompromised patients, clinical impact
- MeSH terms
- Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Respiratory Tract Infections, Retrospective Studies, Virus Cultivation, Viruses, Cell Culture Techniques, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of routine cell culture for respiratory viruses among children with a negative multiplex RT-PCR result. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcv.2017.07.015
- The paper
- AlGhounaim, M., Xiao, Y., Caya, C., & Papenburg, J. (2017). Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of routine cell culture for respiratory viruses among children with a negative multiplex RT-PCR result. Journal of Clinical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2017.07.015