Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) manufacturing of advanced therapy medicinal products: a novel tailored model for optimizing performance and estimating costs
Abstract
Background aims Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) have gained considerable attention in academia due to their therapeutic potential. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) principles ensure the quality and sterility of manufacturing these products. We developed a model for estimating the manufacturing costs of cell therapy products and optimizing the performance of academic GMP-facilities. Methods The "Clean-Room Technology Assessment Technique" (CTAT) was tested prospectively in the GMP facility of BCRT, Berlin, Germany, then retrospectively in the GMP facility of the University of California-Davis, California, USA. CTAT is a two-level model: level one identifies operational (core) processes and measures their fixed costs; level two identifies production (supporting) processes and measures their variable costs. The model comprises several tools to measure and optimize performance of these processes. Manufacturing costs were itemized using adjusted micro-costing system. Results CTAT identified GMP activities with strong correlation to the manufacturing process of cell-based products. Building best practice standards allowed for performance improvement and elimination of human errors. The model also demonstrated the unidirectional dependencies that may exist among the core GMP activities. When compared to traditional business models, the CTAT assessment resulted in a more accurate allocation of annual expenses. The estimated expenses were used to set a fee structure for bo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A U.S. company that seeks to manufacture CAR T-cells in the U.S. and E.U. must comply with both sets of regulations and work with strict oversight from both the FDA and EMA to meet respective manufacturing standards.
“A U.S. company that seeks to manufacture CAR T-cells in the U.S. and E.U. must comply with both sets of regulations and work with strict oversight from both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to meet respective manufacturing standards (133,135,136).”
From Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [136]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Abou-El-Enein, M., Römhild, A., Kaiser, D., Beier, C., Bauer, G., Volk, H.-D., & Reinke, P.
- Affiliations
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (DE)
- University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Cytotherapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-383
- ISSN
- 1465-3249 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056464464
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cytotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- advanced therapy medicinal products, cell therapy manufacturing, good manufacturing practices, production cost estimation, micro-costing, cost allocation, fee structure, process optimization, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Commerce, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Germany, Humans, United States, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review