Proceedings of the first academic symposium on developing, qualifying and operating a cell and gene therapy manufacturing facility
Abstract
A significant portion of the more than 1000 candidate cell and gene therapy products currently under clinical investigation (clinicaltrials.gov) are born out of academic research centers affiliated with universities, hospitals and non-profit research institutions. Supporting these efforts are myriad academic clinical materials production facilities with more than 40 such facilities currently operational in the United States alone. In March 2018, Stanford University's Laboratory for Cell and Gene Therapy held a symposium with the leaders and staff of more than 25 similar facilities to discuss the collective experience in developing, qualifying and operating cell and gene therapy manufacturing facilities according to current Good Manufacturing Practices. Topics included facility design, construction, staffing and operations and compliance. Leaders from several institutions gave overviews of the history of development of the facilities and discussed challenges and opportunities they had experienced over the past 10-20 years of operations. Working sessions were also held to discuss specific aspects of Process Development, Manufacturing, Quality Systems, Regulatory Affairs and Business Development with all participants contributing to the discussions. We summarize here the findings of this inaugural meeting with an emphasis on best practices and suggested guidelines for operations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A U.S. company that seeks to manufacture CAR T-cells in the U.S. and E.U. must comply with both sets of regulations and work with strict oversight from both the FDA and EMA to meet respective manufacturing standards.
“A U.S. company that seeks to manufacture CAR T-cells in the U.S. and E.U. must comply with both sets of regulations and work with strict oversight from both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to meet respective manufacturing standards (133,135,136).”
From Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [135]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- DIGIUSTO, D. L., MELSOP, K., SRIVASTAVA, R., & TRAN, C.-A. T.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Cytotherapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1486-1494
- ISSN
- 1465-3249 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898405715
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cytotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Duke University
- Harvard University
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Stanford University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Keywords
- cell and gene therapy manufacturing, current good manufacturing practice, facility design and construction, manufacturing process development, quality systems, regulatory affairs, compliance, best practices guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities, Humans, United States, Genetic Therapy, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review