Cited by 47Clinical practice guidelines implementationDental Health and Care UtilizationPediatric health and respiratory diseases

Why guidelines for early childhood caries prevention could be ineffective amongst children at high risk

Petti, Stefano·2010·Journal of Dentistry

Abstract

Objective This paper sought to investigate whether early childhood caries (ECC) prevention guidelines were able to produce a significant, long-term, homogeneous decrease in ECC prevalence/incidence within all socio-economic strata of the population and whether their development followed methodologies specifically designed for ECC prevention guidelines. Methods ECC prevention guidelines and specific methodologies published in English since 1995 were searched through MEDLINE, PUBMED and GOOGLE. Data regarding long-term and stratified effect of guidelines and specific methodologies were not found. The only review of methodology for guideline development which was found (produced by the Guideline Development Group of the WHO) was used and adjusted to draft a specific ECC-centred methodology. Results This procedure resulted in nineteen key methodological components for the optimal ECC prevention guideline development. In order to emphasize such necessity of specific methodologies, three of these components (assessment of the strength of scientific evidence, development of consensus amongst Dental Health Care Providers, identification of appropriate outcomes) were described in detail. These examples showed the shortfalls of ECC prevention guidelines developed using methodologies explicitly designed for the development of clinical practice (e.g., therapy, diagnosis, screening) guidelines. Conclusions Guidelines for ECC prevention could help control such disease and improve quality o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petti, S.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Petti, Stefano
Venue
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
946-955
ISSN
0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003857068
Cited by
47
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
Keywords
early childhood caries, guideline development methodology, vulnerable children, socioeconomic disparities, outcome measures
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Dental Caries, Humans, Risk, Social Class, Incidence, Prevalence, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Consensus, Evidence-Based Dentistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review