Use of guidelines to improve the quality and transparency of reporting oral health research
Abstract
Objective The use of reporting guideline is directed at enhancing the completeness and transparency of biomedical publications. The aims of this paper are to present some of the key initiatives and guidelines providing indications and directions on the use of specific tools in oral health research.Methods The EQUATOR Network and five established guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, CARE and SPIRIT) are introduced.Results Five guidelines are presented covering reporting of case reports, non-randomized studies, randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. The importance of adherence to these guidelines by oral health researchers is emphasized.Conclusions Endorsement and robust implementation of reporting guidelines will translate into improved and more complete reporting in health research. Moreover, by ingraining the use of guidelines, it may be possible to indirectly improve the methodological quality of clinical studies. Active implementation strategies to encourage adherence to these guidelines among researchers, reviewers, editors and publishers may be an important facet in the advancement of knowledge in dentistry.Clinical significance Inadequate reporting of research can lead to wasted research resources and risks publication of inaccurate or misleading findings with implications on healthcare decisions. Familiarity and diligent compliance with methodological and reporting guidelines are therefore essential to maximize the yield from dental research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous dental journals have recommended the use of CONSORT for reporting RCTs.
“Following the publication of the CONSORT statement, numerous dental journals have recommended its use for the reporting of RCTs (Sarkis-Onofre et al. 2015).”
From Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity treatment using mouthwashes (2025) · cites this paper as Sarkis-Onofre et al. 2015
The SPIRIT 2013 statement provides minimum reporting guidance for clinical trial protocols and has been widely endorsed as an international standard.
“The SPIRIT statement was published in 2013 to provide guidance for the minimum reporting content of a clinical-trial protocol and has been widely endorsed as an international standard3–5.”
From Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension (2020) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Sarkis-Onofre, R., Cenci, M. S., Demarco, F. F., Lynch, C. D., Fleming, P. S., Pereira-Cenci, T., & Moher, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Dentistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 397-404
- ISSN
- 0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123305639
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (99999.014351/2013-07)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, oral health research, research transparency, EQUATOR Network, CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, care, alcoholic beverages, non-randomized studies, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, methodological quality, guideline adherence, dental research
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Quality Control, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Dental Research, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review