Effect of silver diamine fluoride on plaque microbiome in children
Abstract
Objective To investigate the microbiome profile and relative abundance changes of the plaque on silver diamine fluoride (SDF)-treated caries in children with early childhood caries. Methods A single trained examiner assessed the caries as being arrested or active and then collected plaque samples from the caries lesions from fourteen 5-year-old children immediately before, 2 weeks after, and 12 weeks after a one-off application of 38 % SDF. We assigned 16S rRNA gene sequences to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using a 98.5 % identity cut-off. We also used a variety of taxonomy- and phylogeny-based statistical approaches to compare the biodiversity and relative abundance among different groups. Results The caries arrest rate were 90 % and 83 % after 2 and 12 weeks, respectively. We studied 46 plaque samples and identified 388 OTUs (254 identified at the species level, 129 identified at the genus level, and 76 identified at the family level). There was no significant change in the diversity in the arrested caries before and 12 weeks after SDF treatment (p = 0.71). The diversity in active caries reduced significantly 12 weeks after SDF treatment (p = 0.006). The relative abundance of certain caries-related species (e.g., Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus sp.) was reduced in arrested caries but was increased in active caries after SDF treatment. Conclusion There was no overall microbiome changes in the caries arrested by SDF. The relative abundance of some caries-related…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-site-specific microbiome studies do not establish lesion-level mechanistic transformation sufficient to justify simplified care.
“Non-site-specific microbiome studies do not establish lesion-level mechanistic transformation sufficient to justify simplified care [20,21].”
From Equity or Two-Tier Care? Guardrails for Silver Diamine Fluoride and Delegated Early Childhood Caries Pathways (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Mei, M. L., Yan, Z., Duangthip, D., Niu, J. Y., Yu, O. Y., You, M., Lo, E. C. M., & Chu, C. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Aviagen (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Mei, May Lei
- Chu, Chun Hung
- Venue
- Journal of Dentistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 103479
- ISSN
- 0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012047707
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870812)
- Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
- General Research Fund of Shanghai Normal University (17100218)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
- Keywords
- silver diamine fluoride, dental plaque microbiome, early childhood caries, caries arrest, Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus, bacterial diversity
- MeSH terms
- Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Cariostatic Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Dental Caries, Fluorides, Topical, Humans, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Silver Compounds, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review