Cited by 8Health Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceDental Education, Practice, Research

Web-based intervention to improve the evidence-practice gap in minimal intervention dentistry: Findings from a dental practice-based research network

Open access
Kakudate, Naoki, Yokoyama, Yoko, Sumida, Futoshi, Matsumoto, Yuki, Takata, Tomoka, Gordan, Valeria V., Gilbert, Gregg H.·2021·Journal of Dentistry

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether: the evidence-practice gap (EPG) in minimal intervention dentistry (MID) can be improved by a tailored web-based intervention, and specific clinical situations might impede implementing MID. Methods We conducted a before-after intervention study and a qualitative study. Two web-based questionnaire surveys were conducted among 197 Japanese dentists. In the first questionnaire, a baseline EPG was measured using six questionnaire items. Subsequently, feedback material about the EPG was electronically prepared, including results of the first questionnaire, international comparisons with a previous study from the US, and a summary of recent evidence on MID. In the second questionnaire, the EPG was re-measured after participants read the material. The primary outcome was mean overall concordance between published evidence and the dentist's clinical practice for all six questions. During the second questionnaire, we performed qualitative content analysis using free-text responses to a question about difficult situations encountered when conducting MID. Results Regarding before and after comparisons of concordance between the first and second questionnaires, mean overall concordance improved significantly, from 66% to 89% (p<0.001). Qualitative content analysis identified five difficult situations: "cases where decision making for treatment and prognosis is difficult", "inadequate practice resources", "limitations on patient visit and treatment period", "discrepancy between MID and the patient's values", and "limitations on health insurance and social understanding". Conclusions These results suggest that it is possible to reduce the EPG in MID using a web-based educational intervention among Japanese dentists. Qualitative content analysis revealed five difficult situations that might hinder implementation of MID. Clinical significance Although this intervention demonstrated educational effects, perfect concordance was not achieved by all participants. This is possibly associated with the five situations that participants reported facing when conducting MID. Creating an environment to improve these situations may facilitate a reduction in the EPG.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103854

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impact on everyday practice can be the key research question for some studies, although the typical goal is to contribute to the evidence base in a manner similar to individual "R01" studies or clinical trials.

    “Impact on everyday practice can be the key research question for some studies [30-32], although the typical goal is to contribute to the evidence base in a manner similar to individual “R01” studies or clinical trials.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. [1]Sackett DL, Rosenberg MC, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS, Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t, Br. Med. J 312 (1996) 71– 72, 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. 8555924 PMC2349778 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Bryant J, Boyes A, Jones K, Sanson-Fisher R, Carey M, Fry R, Examining and addressing evidence-practice gaps in cancer care: a systematic review, Implement. Sci 9 (2014) 37, 10.1186/1748-5908-9-37. 24666544 PMC4114221 · DOI
  3. [4]McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA, The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States, N. Engl. J. Med 348 (2003) 2635– 2645, 10.1056/NEJMsa022615. 12826639 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S, Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care, J. Contin. Educ. Health. Prof 27 (2007) 94– 102, 10.1002/chp.106. 17576625 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Buchan H, Gaps between best evidence and practice: causes for concern, Med. J. Aust 180 (2004) S47– S48. 15012579
  6. [7]Grol R, Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence based guidelines for clinical practice, Med. Care 39 (2001) II46– II54, 10.1097/00005650-200108002-00003. 11583121 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]DeNucci DJ, Dental practice-based research networks, in: Giannobile WV, Burt BA, Genco RJ (Eds.), Clinical Research in Oral Health, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009. pp. 265– 293.
  8. [10]Gilbert GH, Williams OD, Korelitz JJ, Fellows JL, Gordan VV, Makhija SK, Meyerowitz C, Oates TW, Rindal DB, Benjamin PL, Foy PJ; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Purpose, structure, and function of the United States National Dental Practice-Based Research Network, J. Dent 41 (2013) 1051– 1059, 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.002. 23597500 PMC3812393 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [11]Kakudate N, Yokoyama Y, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Riley JL 3rd, Gordan VV, Gilbert GH. Practice-based research agenda priorities selected by patients: findings from a dental practice-based research network, Int. Dent. J 69 (2019) 183– 191, 10.1111/idj.12447“. 30350855 PMC6478567 · DOI
  10. [13]Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Heft MW, Fellows JL, Qvist V, Rindal DB, Gilbert GH, DPBRN Collaborative Group, Restorative treatment thresholds for interproximal primary caries based on radiographic images: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network, Gen. Dent 57 (2009) 654– 663. 19906618 PMC2819355
  11. [14]Gordan VV, Bader JD, Garvan CW, Richman JS, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Rindal DB, Gilbert GH, Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group, Restorative treatment thresholds for occlusal primary caries among dentists in the dental practice-based research network, J. Am. Dent. Assoc 141 (2010) 171– 184, 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0136. 20123876 PMC2819231 · DOI
  12. [15]Riley JL, Richman JS, Rindal DB, Fellows JL, Qvist V, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Dental PBRN Collaborative Group, Use of caries-preventive agents in children: findings from the dental practice-based research network, Oral. Health. Prev. Dent 8 (2010) 351– 359, 10.3290/j.ohpd.a19970. 21180672 PMC3074637 · DOI
  13. [16]Riley JL 3rd, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Rindal DB, Richman JS, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, DPBRN Collaborative Group, Dentists’ use of caries risk assessment in children: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network, Gen. Dent 58 (2010) 230– 234. 20478803 PMC2874201
  14. [17]Riley JL 3rd, Gordan VV, Ajmo CT, Bockman H, Jackson MB, Gilbert GH, Dental PBRN Collaborative Group, Dentists’ use of caries risk assessment and individualized caries prevention for their adult patients: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network, Community. Dent. Oral. Epidemiol 39 (2011) 564– 573. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00626.x. 21726268 PMC3193859 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [19]Norton WE, Funkhouser E, Makhija SK, Gordan VV, Bader JD, Rindal DB, Pihlstrom DJ, Hilton TJ, Frantsve-Hawley J, Gilbert GH, Concordance between clinical practice and published evidence: findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network, J. Am. Dent. Assoc 145 (2014) 22– 31, 10.14219/jada.2013.21. 24379327 PMC3881267 · DOI
  16. [20]Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Manabe K, Yokoyama Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Restorative treatment thresholds for proximal caries in Dental PBRN, J.Dent. Res 91 (2012) 1202– 1208. 10.1177/0022034512464778. 23053847 PMC3497908 · DOI
  17. [21]Yokoyama Y, Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Dentists’ dietary perception and practice patterns in a dental practice-based research Network, PLoS One 8 (2013) e59615. 10.1371/journal.pone.0059615. 23536883 PMC3607573 · DOI
  18. [22]Yokoyama Y, Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Dentists’ practice patterns regarding caries prevention: results from a dental practice-based research network, BMJ Open 3 (2013) e003227. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003227. PMC3787415 24068763 · DOI
  19. [23]Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Yokoyama Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Patient age and dentists’ decisions about occlusal caries treatment thresholds, Oper. Dent 39 (2014) 473– 480, 10.2341/13-141-C. 24809540 PMC4145017 · DOI
  20. [24]Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Yokoyama Y, Riley JL 3rd, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Dentists’ decisions to conduct caries risk assessment in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network, Community. Dent. Oral. Epidemiol 43 (2015) 128– 134, 10.1111/cdoe.12127. 25175077 PMC4345143 · DOI
  21. [25]Yokoyama Y, Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Evidence-practice gap for in-office fluoride application in a dental practice-based research network, J. Public. Health. Dent 76 (2016) 91– 97, 10.1111/jphd.12114. 26235360 PMC5584372 · DOI
  22. [26]Kakudate N, Yokoyama Y, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gordan VV, Gilbert GH, Velly AM, Schiffman EL, Dentist practice patterns and therapeutic confidence in the treatment of pain related to temporomandibular disorders in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network, J. Oral. Facial. Pain. Headache 31 (2017) 152– 158, 10.11607/ofph.1730. 28437512 PMC5857949 · DOI
  23. [27]Kakudate N, Yokoyama Y, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gordan VV, Gilbert GH, Dentists’ practice patterns of treatment for deep occlusal caries: Findings from a dental practice-based research network, J. Dent 84 (2019) 76– 80, 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.009. 30935965 PMC6545242 · DOI
  24. [28]Kakudate N, Yokoyama Y, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Yamazaki H, Touge T, Fujikawa Y, Gordan VV, Gilbert GH, Evidence-practice gap in minimal intervention dentistry: Findings from a dental practice-based research network, J. Dent 102 (2020) 103469, 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103469. 32916232 PMC7669590 · DOI
  25. [29]Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ, Minimal intervention dentistry—a review. FDI Commission Project 1–97, Int. Dent. J 50 (2000) 1– 12, 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x. 10945174 · DOI
  26. [30]Momoi Y, Hayashi M, Fujitani M, Fukushima M, Imazato S, Kubo S, Nikaido T, Shimizu A, Unemori M, Yamaki C, Clinical guidelines for treating caries in adults following a minimal intervention policy--evidence and consensus based report, J. Dent 40 (2012) 95– 105, 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.011. 22079371 · DOI
  27. [31]FDI World Dental Federation, FDI policy statement on Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) for managing dental caries: adopted by the general assembly: September 2016, Poznan, Poland, Int. Dent. J 67 (2017) 6– 7, 10.1111/idj.12308. 28194784 PMC9376679 · DOI
  28. [32]Gilbert GH, Richman JS, Qvist V, Pihlstrom DJ, Foy PJ, Gordan VV, DPBRN Collaborative Group, Change in stated clinical practice associated with participation in the Dental Practice-Based Research Network, Gen. Dent 58 (2010) 520– 528. 21062721 PMC3105524
  29. [33]Gilbert GH, Gordan VV, Funkhouser EM, Rindal DB, Fellows JL, Qvist V, Anderson G, Worley D, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group, Caries treatment in a dental practice-based research network: movement toward stated evidence-based treatment, Community. Dent. Oral. Epidemiol 41 (2013) 143– 153, 10.1111/cdoe.12008. 23036131 PMC3811014 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [34]Rindal DB, Flottemesch TJ, Durand EU, Godlevsky OV, Schmidt AM, Gilbert GH, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group, Practice change toward better adherence to evidence-based treatment of early dental decay in the National Dental PBRN, Implement. Sci 9 (2014) 177, 10.1186/s13012-014-0177-x. 25603497 PMC4260248 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [35]Jeggle LM, Baker SR, Schwendicke F, Changing dentists’ carious tissue removal behavior: Qualitative study and behavioral change simulation experiment, J. Dent 81 (2019) 43– 51, 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.010. 30579857 · DOI
  32. [36]Mettes TG, van der Sanden WJ, Bronkhorst E, Grol RP, Wensing M, Plasschaert AJ, Impact of guideline implementation on patient care: a cluster RCT, J. Dent. Res 89 (2010) 71– 76, 10.1177/0022034509350971. 19966044 · DOI
  33. [37]Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM, Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis, JAMA 300 (2008) 1181– 1196, 10.1001/jama.300.10.1181. 18780847 · DOI
  34. [38]Chiang HK, Best AM, Sarrett DC, Concordance between clinical practice and published evidence: findings from Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, J. Evid. Based. Dent. Pract 17 (2017) 169– 176, 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.03.004. 28865813 · DOI
  35. [39]Braun V, Clarke V, What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers?, Int. J. Qual. Stud. Heal 9 (2014) 26152, 10.3402/qhw.v9.26152. PMC4201665 25326092 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [41]Gordan VV, Riley JL 3rd, Geraldeli S, Rindal DB, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Kellum HP, Gilbert GH, Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group, Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in the dental practice-based research network, J. Am. Dent. Assoc 143 (2012) 593– 601. 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0238. 22653939 PMC3368503 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [42]Innes NPT, Schwendicke F. Restorative Thresholds for Carious Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Dent. Res 96 (2017) 501– 508, 10.1177/0022034517693605. 28195749 · DOI
  38. [43]Neuppmann Feres MF, Roscoe MG MG, Job SA, Mamani JB, Canto GL, Flores-Mir C, Barriers involved in the application of evidence-based dentistry principles: A systematic review, J. Am. Dent. Assoc 151 (2020) 16– 25, 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.08.011. 31902396 · DOI
  39. [44]Mitchell ST, Funkhouser E, Gordan VV, Riley JL 3rd, Makhija SK, Litaker MS, Gilbert GH; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group, Satisfaction with dental care among patients who receive invasive or non-invasive treatment for non-cavitated early dental caries: findings from one region of the National Dental PBRN, BMC Oral Health 17 (2017) 70, 10.1186/s12903-017-0363-8. 28347303 PMC5368933 · DOI

Authors
Kakudate, N., Yokoyama, Y., Sumida, F., Matsumoto, Y., Takata, T., Gordan, V. V., & Gilbert, G. H.
Affiliations
  • Kyushu Dental University (JP)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Kakudate, Naoki
Venue
Journal of Dentistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
115
Pages
103854
ISSN
0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208214907
Cited by
8
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U19-DE-22516, U19-DE-28717)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP16K11866)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
knowledge-practice gap, minimal intervention dentistry, web-based educational intervention, dental education, implementation barriers, patient values, Japanese dentists
MeSH terms
Professional Practice Gaps, Internet-Based Intervention, Dentistry, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review