The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporomandibular joint segmentation in MRI images using deep learning
Abstract
Objectives Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements (ID) represent the most prevalent temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) in the population and its diagnosis typically relies on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). TMJ articular discs in MRIs usually suffer from low resolution and contrast, and it is difficult to identify them. In this study, we applied two convolutional neural networks (CNN) to delineate mandibular condyle, articular eminence, and TMJ disc in MRI images. Methods The models were trained on MRI images from 100 patients and validated on images from 40 patients using 2D slices and 3D volume as input, respectively. Data augmentation and five-fold cross-validation scheme were applied to further regularize the models. The accuracy of the models was then compared with four raters having different expertise in reading TMJ-MRI images to evaluate the performance of the models. Results Both models performed well in segmenting the three anatomical structures. A Dice coefficient of about 0.7 for the articular disc, more than 0.9 for the mandibular condyle, and Hausdorff distance of about 2mm for the articular eminence were achieved in both models. The models reached near-expert performance for the segmentation of TMJ articular disc and performed close to the expert in the segmentation of mandibular condyle and articular eminence. They also surpassed non-experts in segmenting the three anatomical structures. Conclusion This study demonstrated that CNN-based segmentation models can be a reliable tool to assist clinicians identifying key anatomy on TMJ-MRIs. The approach also paves the way for automatic diagnosis of TMD. Clinical significance Accurately locating the articular disc is the hardest and most crucial step in the interpretation of TMJ-MRIs and consequently in the diagnosis of TMJ-ID. Automated software that assists in locating the articular disc and its surrounding structures would improve the reliability of TMJ-MRI interpretation, save time and assist in reader training. It will also serve as a foundation for additional automated analysis of pathology in TMJ structures to aid in TMD diagnosis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 2022 model exhibited 89% accuracy in identifying pediatric patients at elevated risk of caries progression.
“A 2022 model exhibited an exceptional 89% accuracy in identifying pediatric patients at elevated risk [87].”
From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016) · Journal of Chiropractic Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 · Cited by 31,709
Self-citationSchiffman, E., Ohrbach, R., Truelove, E., Look, J., Anderson, G., Goulet, J.-P., List, T., Svensson, P., Gonzalez, Y., Lobbezoo, F., et al. (2014) · Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache · doi:10.11607/jop.1151 · Cited by 4,567
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Valesan, 2021, Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Oral Investig., 25, 441, 10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w · DOI
- Hunter, 2013, Diagnostic imaging for temporomandibular disorders and orofacial pain, Dent. Clin. N. Am., 57, 405, 10.1016/j.cden.2013.04.008 · DOI
- Nebbe, 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: interobserver agreement in subjective classification of disk status, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol., 90, 102, 10.1067/moe.2000.106300 · DOI
- Widmalm, 2006, Limitation of the diagnostic value of MR images for diagnosing temporomandibular joint disorders, Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 35, 334, 10.1259/dmfr/23427399 · DOI
- Alkhader, 2010, Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting osseous abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography, Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 39, 270, 10.1259/dmfr/25151578 · DOI
- Al-Saleh, 2017, Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joint using MRI-CBCT image registration, PLoS One, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0169555 · DOI
- Nascimento Falcão, 2017, 3D Morphology analysis of TMJ articular eminence in magnetic resonance imaging, Int. J. Dent., 2017, 1, 10.1155/2017/5130241 · DOI
- R. Szeliski, Computer vision: algorithms and applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010. · DOI
- I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, Y. Bengio, Deep learning, MIT press Cambridge, 2016.
- Sultana, 2020, Evolution of image segmentation using deep convolutional neural network: a survey, Knowl. Based Syst., 201–202, 1
- Siddique, 2021, U-Net and its variants for medical image segmentation: a review of theory and applications, IEEE Access, 9, 82031, 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086020 · DOI
- Belikova, 2021, Deep negative volume segmentation, Sci. Rep., 11, 16292, 10.1038/s41598-021-95526-1 · DOI
- Iwaszenko, 2021, New method for analysis of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography, Sensors, 21, 1, 10.3390/s21093070 · DOI
- Liu, 2021, Tracking-based deep learning method for temporomandibular joint segmentation, Ann. Transl. Med., 9, 1
- Costa, 2008, Comparison of conventional MRI and 3D reconstruction model for evaluation of temporomandibular joint, Surg. Radiol. Anat., 30, 663, 10.1007/s00276-008-0400-z · DOI
- Nozawa, 2021, Automatic segmentation of the temporomandibular joint disc on magnetic resonance images using a deep learning technique, Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 50
- de Rooij, 2020, Cross-validation: a method every psychologist should know, Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci., 3, 248, 10.1177/2515245919898466 · DOI
- Zhou, 2019, Unet++: redesigning skip connections to exploit multiscale features in image segmentation, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 39, 1856, 10.1109/TMI.2019.2959609 · DOI
- Lin, 2020, Focal loss for dense object detection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 42, 318, 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2858826 · DOI · Paper page
- Loshchilov, 2016, Sgdr: stochastic gradient descent with restarts, CoRR, abs/1608.03983 · arXiv
- Isensee, 2021, nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation, Nat. Methods, 18, 203, 10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z · DOI · Paper page
- de Mello Provenzano, 2012, How should the articular disk position be analyzed?, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 70, 1534, 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.004 · DOI
- Arifin, 2018, A web-based sample size calculator for reliability studies, Educ. Med. J., 10, 67, 10.21315/eimj2018.10.3.8 · DOI
- Valesan, 2021, Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin. Oral Investig., 25, 441, 10.1007/s00784-020-03710-w · DOI
- Emshoff, 2003, Relative odds of temporomandibular joint pain as a function of magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement, osteoarthrosis, effusion, and bone marrow edema, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol., 95, 437, 10.1067/moe.2003.95 · DOI
- Pauwels, 2015, Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art, Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 44, 10.1259/dmfr.20140224 · DOI
- Kim, 2021, Using deep learning to predict temporomandibular joint disc perforation based on magnetic resonance imaging, Sci. Rep., 11, 1
- Ito, 2022, Automated segmentation of articular disc of the temporomandibular joint on magnetic resonance images using deep learning, Sci. Rep., 12, 1, 10.1038/s41598-021-04354-w · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AL-Kaff, A. A., Alshehri, A. Z., Alasmari, R. A., Alsubaie, N., Aldaws, A., Althaqeel, A., Alshehri, R. S., & Alawaji, Y. M. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.87450 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., Punithakumar, K., Major, P. W., Le, L. H., Nguyen, K.-C. T., Pacheco-Pereira, C., Kaipatur, N. R., Nebbe, B., Jaremko, J. L., & Almeida, F. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Almeida, Fabiana T
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Dentistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 104345
- ISSN
- 0300-5712 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4308529557
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Keywords
- temporomandibular joint, temporomandibular joint internal derangement, temporomandibular disorders, convolutional neural networks, computer-aided diagnosis, radiologist performance comparison
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Temporomandibular Joint, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Temporomandibular Joint Disc
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review