Prevention of the ultraviolet effects on clinical and histopathological changes, as well as the heat shock protein-70 expression in mouse skin by topical application of algal UV-absorbing compounds
Abstract
Background Sunscreens have long been used to protect against the acute effects of UV radiation. They can also have protective effects on chronic UV-induced changes, such as photoaging and skin cancer. Recent studies have focused on marine organisms as a source of natural bioactive molecules and some UV-absorbing algal compounds are under investigation as candidates for new natural sunscreens.Objective The cutaneous photoprotective ability of the mycosporine-like aminoacids (MAAs) Porphyra-334 and shinorine (P-334+SH), high UV-absorbing compounds isolated from the red alga Porphyra rosengurttii, was evaluated by in vivo procedures in mouse skin. The expression of the heat shock protein HSP70 as a potential biomarker for acute UV damage was also investigated.Methods A galenic formulation containing the MAA combination of P-334+SH was applied topically to the dorsal skin of SkhR-1 H hairless mice, which were irradiated with a single UV radiation dose of 3.87Jcm(-2) and compared with a combination of UVB- and UVA-absorbing reference filters. Clinical signs of sunburn, such as erythema and edema, as well as other quantifiable histological and biochemical parameters, such as the expression of the heat shock protein 70 and antioxidant enzyme activities, were measured from skin biopsies at 6, 24, 48 and 72h post-radiation.Results The formulation containing MAA prevented sunburn cell formation, as well as corneum stratum, malphigian, dermal and hypodermal thickening and other structural and morphological alterations observed in biopsies of non-photoprotected skin. A significant increase in Hsp70 was observed in the epidermis of non-photoprotected mouse skin, besides a de novo expression in deeper layers. P-334+SH protected against the significant decrease in superoxide dismutase and catalase activities observed in non-photoprotected mice.Conclusion The topical application of P-334+SH protected against UV-induced skin damage in mice and contributed to maintaining the antioxidant defence system of the skin as well as Hsp70 expression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Application of a reference sunscreen or a porphyra-334 and shinorine formulation offered complete protection against reduced catalase and superoxide dismutase activity and decreased Hsp70 expression in unprotected mouse skin.
“Catalase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) showed reduced post-irradiation activity over time in unprotected mouse skin. However, the application of a reference sunscreen, or a porphyra-334 and shinorine formulation offered complete protection, along with a decrease in the expression of 70 kilodalton heat shock (stress) protein (Hsp70) [100].”
From Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids for Skin Photoprotection (2019) · cites this paper as [100]
In SKH-1 hairless mice, a galenic formulation of 2% porphyra-334 and shinorine at a ratio of 88:12 applied to dorsal skin prevented solar simulated UVR induced erythema, stratum corneum thickening, edema and sun burn cell formation comparable with a reference sunscreen; the calculated SPF was 3.71±0.78.
“A more robust study in SKH-1 hairless mice, with a galenic formulation of 2% porphyra-334 and shinorine (ratio of 88:12) applied to the dorsal skin, prevented solar simulated UVR induced erythema, stratum corneum thickening, edema and sun burn cell formation (apoptosis) comparable with a reference sunscreen (the reference sunscreen is the standard used in sunscreen testing according to COLIPA”
From Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids for Skin Photoprotection (2019) · cites this paper as [100]
MAAs from other algae protect skin of higher organisms against UV damage.
“MAAs from other algae have been shown to protect skin of higher organisms against UV damage (de la Coba et al., 2009).”
From Microalgae Metabolites: A Rich Source for Food and Medicine (2019) · cites this paper as de la Coba et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- de la Coba, F., Aguilera, J., de Gálvez, M. V., Álvarez, M., Gallego, E., Figueroa, F. L., & Herrera, E.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Málaga (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Aguilera, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Dermatological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 161-169
- ISSN
- 0923-1811 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023899696
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Dermatological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (AGL 2005-02655)
- Junta de Andalucía (RNM-295)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Keywords
- mycosporine-like amino acids, porphyra-334, shinorine, natural sunscreen, photoprotection, UV-induced skin damage, sunburn, HSP70, antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase, catalase, skin histopathology
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Topical, Rhodophyta, Animals, Catalase, Cyclohexanones, Cyclohexylamines, Female, Glycine, Mice, Hairless, Skin, Sunburn, Sunscreening Agents, Superoxide Dismutase, Ultraviolet Rays, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review