Cited by 131Skin Protection and AgingToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactAir Quality and Health Impacts

Photo-pollution stress in skin: Traces of pollutants (PAH and particulate matter) impair redox homeostasis in keratinocytes exposed to UVA1

Soeur, Jérémie, Belaïdi, Jean-Philippe, Chollet, Christel, Denat, Laurence, Dimitrov, Ariane, Jones, Christophe, Perez, Philippe, Zanini, Martine +6 more·2017·Journal of Dermatological Science

Abstract

Background It is likely that skin is exposed to low concentrations of pollutants such as Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) either through topical penetration by ultrafine particles or by systemic distribution. No precise estimation of pollutants in living skin is available, but literature has reported contamination of blood by PAH at concentrations in the nanomolar range. Some pollutants (PAH for example) are photo-reactive and phototoxic: sunlight and pollution might thus synergistically compromise skin health.Objective Here, the biological effects of particulate matter, PM extract and various PAH were compared in normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and reconstructed skin model exposed to either daily UV (d-UV 300-400nm) or UVA1 (350-400nm). Impact of pollutants (PM, PAH or PM extract) combined to UV was studied on NHEK by measuring toxicity, redox homeostasis and GSH metabolism in NHEK.Methods NHEK were exposed to UV from solar simulator (either d-UV or UVA1) combined with pollutants. Viability, clonogenic efficiency, redox homeostasis and GSH metabolism were assessed.Results Pollutants (PAH, PM or PM extract) ±UVA1 irradiation was associated with a significant phototoxic effect that was equal to or greater than that produced by d-UV. This result is interesting considering that UVA1 represents around 80% of daily UV and reaches the dermal-epidermal junction with ease. Moreover, among PAH studied, benzo[a]pyrene and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene were phototoxic at very low concentrations (nanomolar range) on cultured cells or in reconstructed epidermis and also impaired keratinocyte clonogenic potential at sub-toxic doses. ROS generation within cells and in the inner mitochondrial compartment, mitochondrial membrane depolarization and/or reduced ATP production were also noted. Meanwhile, intracellular glutathione concentrations transiently decreased several hours post-treatment and reduction of its synthesis by buthionine sulfoximine potentiated PAH phototoxicity. Consequently, expression of GSH neo-synthesis genes such as SLC7A11 or GCLc was upregulated several hours post-treatment.Conclusion These results obtained using PAH concentrations in the range of those reported in blood of pollution-exposed people suggest that exposure to such a photo-pollution stress, particularly if chronic, may impair cutaneous homeostasis and aggravate sunlight-induced skin damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.01.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro experiments showed that the induction of cytotoxic and oxidative mechanisms by some PAHs was increased when human keratinocytes were exposed to both PAHs and UVA in particular.

    “Moreover, in vitro experiments showed that the induction of cytotoxic7, 8 and oxidative8, 52 mechanisms by some PAHs was increased when human keratinocytes were exposed to both PAHs and UVA in particular (for a review53).”

    From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 131

Authors
Soeur, J., Belaïdi, J.-P., Chollet, C., Denat, L., Dimitrov, A., Jones, C., Perez, P., Zanini, M., Zobiri, O., Mezzache, S., Erdmann, D., Lereaux, G., Eilstein, J., & Marrot, L.
Affiliations
L'Oréal (France) (FR)
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
162-169
ISSN
0923-1811 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2576345141
Cited by
131
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dermatological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
Keywords
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, particulate matter, UVA1, phototoxicity, keratinocytes, redox homeostasis, glutathione metabolism, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial depolarization, SLC7A11, GCLC, clonogenicity
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Epidermis, Fibroblasts, Glutathione, Homeostasis, Humans, Light, Oxidation-Reduction, Photochemistry, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Pyrenes, Skin, Sunlight, Ultraviolet Rays, Keratinocytes, Particulate Matter, Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review