Cited by 205Air Quality and Health ImpactsDermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and Aging

Urban particulate matter in air pollution penetrates into the barrier-disrupted skin and produces ROS-dependent cutaneous inflammatory response in vivo

Jin, Seon-Pil, Li, Zhenyu, Choi, Eun Kyung, Lee, Serah, Kim, Yoen Kyung, Seo, Eun Young, Chung, Jin Ho, Cho, Soyun·2018·Journal of Dermatological Science

Abstract

Background Particulate matter (PM) is an integral part of air pollution, which is a mixture of particles suspended in the air. Recently, it has been reported that PM is associated with increased risks of skin diseases, especially atopic dermatitis in children. However, it is unclear if PM directly goes into the skin and what mechanisms are involved in response to PM.Objective To see whether PM could penetrate into the barrier-disrupted skin, produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), and elicit an inflammatory response.Methods We collected PMs during a winter in Seoul and used cultured keratinocytes for in vitro study and tape-stripped BALB/c mice for in vivo study.Results Keratinocyte cytotoxicity increased in a dose-dependent manner by PM treatment. IL-8 and MMP-1 mRNA expression and protein levels were significantly increased compared to control by qPCR and ELISA, respectively. Cellular ROS production was increased by PM treatment, and antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine pretreatment prevented induction of inflammatory cytokines IL-8 and MMP-1. In PM-treated keratinocytes, electron-dense subcellular particles were observed by transmission electron microscopy. PM was observed inside hair follicles in both intact and barrier-disrupted skin in vivo. Additionally, intercellular penetration of PM was seen in the barrier-disrupted skin. Repeated PM application induced epidermal thickening and dermal inflammation with neutrophil infiltration. Finally, N-acetyl cysteine could ameliorate skin inflammation induced by PM application.Conclusion PM penetrates into the barrier-disrupted skin, causing inflammation, demonstrating detrimental effects in the skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2018.04.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PM exposure has a potential relationship with atopic dermatitis.

    “These findings imply a potential relationship between PM exposure and AD73.”

    From Air Pollution and Skin Diseases (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

  • Clinically, PM exposure leads to epidermal thickening and dermal inflammatory cell infiltration.

    “Clinically, PM exposure leads to epidermal thickening and dermal inflammatory cell infiltration73.”

    From Air Pollution and Skin Diseases (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

  • Prolonged and frequent exposure to PM could induce skin irritation, resulting in epidermal thickening and dermal inflammation.

    “Prolonged and frequent exposure to PM could induce skin irritation, resulting in epidermal thickening and dermal inflammation73.”

    From Air Pollution and Skin Diseases (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

  • Cellular ROS production mediates PM-induced cytokine production in cultured primary keratinocytes.

    “Cellular ROS production has been shown to mediate PM‐induced cytokine production in cultured primary keratinocytes.46”

    From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [46]

  • PM penetrates the epidermis through hair follicles in normal, intact skin and causes cutaneous inflammation in a mouse model.

    “Jin et al. reported that PM penetrates the epidermis through hair follicles in normal, intact skin and causes cutaneous inflammation in a mouse model (7).”

    From Particulate matter causes skin barrier dysfunction. (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 205

Authors
Jin, S.-P., Li, Z., Choi, E. K., Lee, S., Kim, Y. K., Seo, E. Y., Chung, J. H., & Cho, S.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, Soyun
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
175-183
ISSN
0923-1811 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800501827
Cited by
205
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 4
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dermatological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2015R1D1A1A01056934)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
particulate matter, air pollution, skin barrier disruption, reactive oxygen species, keratinocyte cytotoxicity, interleukin-8, MMP-1, N-acetylcysteine, hair follicle, epidermal thickening, skin inflammation, neutrophil infiltration, atopic dermatitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review