The duration of diabetes affects the response to intensive glucose control in type 2 subjects: the VA Diabetes Trial
Abstract
Background The goal of the VA Diabetes Trial (VADT) was to determine the effect of intensive glucose control on macrovascular events in subjects with difficult-to-control diabetes. No significant benefit was found. This report examines predictors of the effect of intensive therapy on the primary outcome in this population.Methods This trial included 1791 subjects. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors were collected by interview and the VA record. The analyses were done by intention to treat.Findings Univariate analysis at baseline of predictors of a primary cardiovascular (CV) event included a prior CV event, age, insulin use at baseline, and duration of diagnosed diabetes (all P < .0001). Multivariable modeling revealed a U-shaped relationship between duration of diabetes and treatment. Modeled estimates for the hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment show that subjects with a short duration (3 years or less) of diagnosed diabetes have a nonsignificant increase in risk (HR > 1.0) after which the HR is below 1.0. From 7 to 15 years' duration at entry, subjects have HRs favoring intensive treatment. Thereafter the HR approaches 1.0 and over-21-years' duration approaches 2.0. Duration over 21 years resulted in a HR of 1.977 (CI 1.77-3.320, P < .01). Baseline c-peptide levels progressively declined up to 15 years and were stable subsequently.Interpretation In difficult-to-control older subjects with type 2 DM, duration of diabetes altered the response to intensive glucose control. Intensive therapy may reduce CV events in subjects with a duration of 15 years or less and may increase risks in those with longer duration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Post-hoc analyses suggested that mortality in the intensive vs. standard glycemic control arm was inversely related to duration of diabetes at the time of study enrollment; those with diabetes duration less than 15 years had a mortality benefit in the intensive arm, while those with duration of 20 years or more had higher mortality in the intensive arm.
“Post-hoc analyses suggested that mortality in the intensive vs. standard glycemic control arm was inversely related to duration of diabetes at the time of study enrollment. Those with diabetes duration less than 15 years had a mortality benefit in the intensive arm, while those with duration of 20 years or more had higher mortality in the intensive arm31.”
From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [31]
Mortality findings in ACCORD and subgroup analyses of VADT suggest that the potential risks of intensive glycemic control may outweigh its benefits in higher-risk individuals.
“Mortality findings in ACCORD (62) and subgroup analyses of VADT (66) suggest that the potential risks of intensive glycemic control may outweigh its benefits in higher-risk individuals.”
From 6. Glycemic Targets: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Duckworth, W. C., Abraira, C., Moritz, T. E., Davis, S. N., Emanuele, N., Goldman, S., Hayward, R., Huang, G. D., Marks, J. B., Reaven, P. D., Reda, D. J., Warren, S. R., & Zieve, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Phoenix VA Health Care System (US)
- Miami VA Healthcare System (US)
- Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US)
- Southern Arizona VA Health Care System (US)
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
- VA Office of Research and Development (US)
- New Mexico VA Health Care System (US)
- Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Duckworth, William C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 355-361
- ISSN
- 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
- 1056-8727
- OpenAlex
- W2154899941
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079637)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetes duration, tight glycemic control, cardiovascular events, predictors of treatment response, C-peptide, older veterans, insulin use, macrovascular complications
- MeSH terms
- C-Peptide, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, United States, Veterans, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Single-Blind Method, Intention to Treat Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review