Cited by 152Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The duration of diabetes affects the response to intensive glucose control in type 2 subjects: the VA Diabetes Trial

Duckworth, William C., Abraira, Carlos, Moritz, Thomas E., Davis, Stephen N., Emanuele, Nicholas, Goldman, Steven, Hayward, Rodney, Huang, Grant D. +5 more·2011·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

Background The goal of the VA Diabetes Trial (VADT) was to determine the effect of intensive glucose control on macrovascular events in subjects with difficult-to-control diabetes. No significant benefit was found. This report examines predictors of the effect of intensive therapy on the primary outcome in this population.Methods This trial included 1791 subjects. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors were collected by interview and the VA record. The analyses were done by intention to treat.Findings Univariate analysis at baseline of predictors of a primary cardiovascular (CV) event included a prior CV event, age, insulin use at baseline, and duration of diagnosed diabetes (all P < .0001). Multivariable modeling revealed a U-shaped relationship between duration of diabetes and treatment. Modeled estimates for the hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment show that subjects with a short duration (3 years or less) of diagnosed diabetes have a nonsignificant increase in risk (HR > 1.0) after which the HR is below 1.0. From 7 to 15 years' duration at entry, subjects have HRs favoring intensive treatment. Thereafter the HR approaches 1.0 and over-21-years' duration approaches 2.0. Duration over 21 years resulted in a HR of 1.977 (CI 1.77-3.320, P < .01). Baseline c-peptide levels progressively declined up to 15 years and were stable subsequently.Interpretation In difficult-to-control older subjects with type 2 DM, duration of diabetes altered the response to intensive glucose control. Intensive therapy may reduce CV events in subjects with a duration of 15 years or less and may increase risks in those with longer duration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2011.10.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-hoc analyses suggested that mortality in the intensive vs. standard glycemic control arm was inversely related to duration of diabetes at the time of study enrollment; those with diabetes duration less than 15 years had a mortality benefit in the intensive arm, while those with duration of 20 years or more had higher mortality in the intensive arm.

    “Post-hoc analyses suggested that mortality in the intensive vs. standard glycemic control arm was inversely related to duration of diabetes at the time of study enrollment. Those with diabetes duration less than 15 years had a mortality benefit in the intensive arm, while those with duration of 20 years or more had higher mortality in the intensive arm31.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Mortality findings in ACCORD and subgroup analyses of VADT suggest that the potential risks of intensive glycemic control may outweigh its benefits in higher-risk individuals.

    “Mortality findings in ACCORD (62) and subgroup analyses of VADT (66) suggest that the potential risks of intensive glycemic control may outweigh its benefits in higher-risk individuals.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 152

Authors
Duckworth, W. C., Abraira, C., Moritz, T. E., Davis, S. N., Emanuele, N., Goldman, S., Hayward, R., Huang, G. D., Marks, J. B., Reaven, P. D., Reda, D. J., Warren, S. R., & Zieve, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Phoenix VA Health Care System (US)
  • Miami VA Healthcare System (US)
  • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
  • VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US)
  • Southern Arizona VA Health Care System (US)
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
  • VA Office of Research and Development (US)
  • New Mexico VA Health Care System (US)
  • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Duckworth, William C.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
355-361
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W2154899941
Cited by
152
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK079637)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes duration, tight glycemic control, cardiovascular events, predictors of treatment response, C-peptide, older veterans, insulin use, macrovascular complications
MeSH terms
C-Peptide, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, United States, Veterans, Body Mass Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Single-Blind Method, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review