Self-efficacy, self-management, and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Abstract
Objective The objective was to evaluate the relationships between diabetes management self-efficacy and diabetes self-management behaviors and glycemic control.Methods A cross-sectional design was used. A convenience sample of 223 subjects with type 2 diabetes, ≥25 years old, who sought care at the National Diabetes Center in Amman, Jordan, was enrolled. A structured interview and medical records provided the data. The instruments included a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, a diabetes management self-efficacy scale, and a diabetes self-management behaviors scale. Glycosylated hemoglobin was used as an index for glycemic control. The analyses are presented as proportions, means (±S.D.), odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals obtained from logistic regressions.Results Diet self-efficacy and diet self-management behaviors predicted better glycemic control, whereas insulin use was a statistically significant predictor for poor glycemic control. In addition, subjects with higher self-efficacy reported better self-management behaviors in diet, exercise, blood sugar testing, and taking medication. The findings showed that more than half of the subjects did not have their diabetes under control and that only 42% had attended diabetes education programs.Conclusions The majority of subjects did not have their diabetes controlled; their self-efficacy was low, and they had suboptimal self-management behaviors. Therefore, strategies to enhance and promote self-efficacy and self-management behaviors for patients are essential components of diabetes education programs. Furthermore, behavioral counseling and skill-building interventions are critical for the patients to become confident and be able to manage their diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among people with diabetes, positive psychological attributes like optimism and positive affect correlate with better medical results, such as improved glucose control and reduced mortality.
“In patients with diabetes, psychological well-being constructs (e.g., optimism, positive affect) have been associated with superior medical outcomes, including better glucose control and lower mortality rates.”
From Well-being interventions for individuals with diabetes: A systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 307
- Authors
- Al-Khawaldeh, O. A., Al-Hassan, M. A., & Froelicher, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Mutah University (JO)
- University of Jordan (JO)
- Corresponding author
- Al-Khawaldeh, Omar Abdulhameed
- Venue
- Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-16
- ISSN
- 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
- 1056-8727
- OpenAlex
- W2005695516
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes self-management behavior, glycemic control, HbA1c, insulin use, diabetes education, self-monitoring of blood glucose, physical activity, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Jordan, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review