Cited by 74Diabetes Management and ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Development and validation of risk assessment models for diabetes-related complications based on the DCCT/EDIC data

Open access
Lagani, Vincenzo, Chiarugi, Franco, Thomson, Shona, Fursse, Jo, Lakasing, Edin, Jones, Russell W., Tsamardinos, Ioannis·2015·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

Aim To derive and validate a set of computational models able to assess the risk of developing complications and experiencing adverse events for patients with diabetes. The models are developed on data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) studies, and are validated on an external, retrospectively collected cohort. Methods We selected fifty-one clinical parameters measured at baseline during the DCCT as potential risk factors for the following adverse outcomes: Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD), Hypoglycemia, Ketoacidosis, Microalbuminuria, Proteinuria, Neuropathy and Retinopathy. For each outcome we applied a data-mining analysis protocol in order to identify the best-performing signature, i.e., the smallest set of clinical parameters that, considered jointly, are maximally predictive for the selected outcome. The predictive models built on the selected signatures underwent both an interval validation on the DCCT/EDIC data and an external validation on a retrospective cohort of 393 diabetes patients (49 Type I and 344 Type II) from the Chorleywood Medical Center, UK. Results The selected predictive signatures contain five to fifteen risk factors, depending on the specific outcome. Internal validation performances, as measured by the Concordance Index (CI), range from 0.62 to 0.83, indicating good predictive power. The models achieved comparable performances for the Type I and, quite surpri…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lagani, V., Chiarugi, F., Thomson, S., Fursse, J., Lakasing, E., Jones, R. W., & Tsamardinos, I.
Affiliations
  • Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
  • University of Crete (GR)
Corresponding author
Lagani, Vincenzo
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
479-487
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W2128708195
Cited by
74
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (248590)
  • EPILOGEAS GSRT ARISTEIA II (3446)
  • National Institute of Health
  • General Clinical Research Center Program, NCRR
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes complications, risk prediction model, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, microalbuminuria, proteinuria, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, external validation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Computer Simulation, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review