Cited by 72Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDiabetes Management and Research

Deintensification of hypoglycaemic medications-use of a systematic review approach to highlight safety concerns in older people with type 2 diabetes

Abdelhafiz, A.H., Sinclair, A.J.·2018·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

Importance Intensive treatment of older people with diabetes is common placing them at increased risk of adverse events such as hypoglycaemia and hospitalisation for drug errors. Little is known about when, how or for whom to deintensify hypoglycaemic medications. Objective To explore the characteristics of patients for whom deintensification is appropriate and to determine the outcome of deintensification. Evidence review Medline, Google scholar and EmBase search from 1997 to present was performed using keywords relating to diabetes mellitus, polypharmacy, hypoglycaemia, hospitalisation, deintensification, deprescribing and reduction, simplification or withdrawal of hypoglycaemic medications. Only English language articles were selected. Articles were reviewed for relevance by abstract. A manual review of citations in retrieved articles was performed in addition to the electronic literature search. Findings Those who are over treated appear to be of older age group, frail with weight loss and have multiple medical morbidities especially renal impairment and dementia. Simplification, reduction or even complete withdrawal of hypoglycaemic medications in these patients appears to be feasible without deterioration of glycaemic control. Conclusions Over treatment is common in frail older people with multiple comorbidities and deintensification appears safe in this group of patients. Current recommendations emphasise preventing underuse rather than overuse of medications, and ther…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.11.011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simplification of the insulin plan to match an individual's self-management abilities and available social and medical support reduces hypoglycemia and disease-related distress without worsening glycemic outcomes.

    “Simplification of the insulin plan to match an individual's self-management abilities and their available social and medical support in these situations has been shown to reduce hypoglycemia and diseaserelated distress without worsening glycemic outcomes (100-103).”

    From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [100]

  • Simplification of the insulin plan to match an individual's self-management abilities and their available social and medical support reduces hypoglycemia and disease-related distress without worsening glycemic outcomes.

    “Simplification of the insulin plan to match an individual's self-management abilities and their available social and medical support in these situations has been shown to reduce hypoglycemia and disease-related distress without worsening glycemic outcomes (107-110).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [107]

  • Simplification of the insulin plan to match an individual's self-management abilities and available social and medical support is associated with reduced hypoglycemia and disease-related distress without worsening glycemic outcomes.

    “Studies suggest that simplification of the insulin plan to match an individual’s self-management abilities and their available social and medical support is associated with reduced hypoglycemia and disease-related distress without worsening glycemic outcomes”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [149]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdelhafiz, A. H., & Sinclair, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Rotherham General Hospital (GB)
  • Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, A.J.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
444-450
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W2768271705
Cited by
72
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
treatment deintensification, type 2 diabetes, older adults, hypoglycemia, polypharmacy, deprescribing, overtreatment, frailty, renal dysfunction, dementia, glycemic control, hospitalization, medication errors
MeSH terms
Medical Overuse, Age Factors, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review