Cited by 22Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEconomic Theory and Institutions

Professor Zak’s empirical studies on trust and oxytocin

Conlisk, John·2011·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some intranasal oxytocin studies have been sharply criticised for extravagant data interpretations and unorthodox statistical practices.

    “extravagant data interpretations and unorthodox uses of statistics in some of these studies have been incisively criticised (97)”

    From Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions (2016) · cites this paper as [97]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 22

Authors
Conlisk, J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Conlisk, John
Venue
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
78
Issue
1-2
Pages
160-166
ISSN
0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036107800
Cited by
22
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
trust, oxytocin, market behavior, morality, experimental economics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review