Cited by 238Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMarine and coastal plant biology

Light and growth medium effect on Chlorella vulgaris biomass production

Blair, Matthew Forrest, Kokabian, Bahareh, Gude, Veera Gnaneswar·2014·Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jece.2013.11.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 238

Authors
Blair, M. F., Kokabian, B., & Gude, V. G.
Affiliations
Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gude, Veera Gnaneswar
Venue
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
665-674
ISSN
  • 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-3437
OpenAlex
W2112152176
Cited by
238
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of environmental chemical engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mississippi State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
Keywords
Chlorella vulgaris, algal biomass production, light wavelength, blue light, culture medium composition, nitrogen content, phosphorus content, specific growth rate, microalgae cultivation, culture medium cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review