Light and growth medium effect on Chlorella vulgaris biomass production
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 238
- Authors
- Blair, M. F., Kokabian, B., & Gude, V. G.
- Affiliations
- Mississippi State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gude, Veera Gnaneswar
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 665-674
- ISSN
- 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
- 2213-3437
- OpenAlex
- W2112152176
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of environmental chemical engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mississippi State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
- Keywords
- Chlorella vulgaris, algal biomass production, light wavelength, blue light, culture medium composition, nitrogen content, phosphorus content, specific growth rate, microalgae cultivation, culture medium cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review