The DOI matches its Crossref record; 208 of the 208 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in CO2 conversion and utilization: A review from process systems perspective
Abstract
Abstract Carbon capture and storage (CCS) community has been struggling over the past few decades to demonstrate the economic feasibility of CO2 sequestration. Nevertheless, in practice, it has only proven feasible under conditions with a market for the recovered CO2, such as in the beverage industry or enhanced oil/gas recovery. The research community and industry are progressively converging to a conclusion that CO2 sequestration has severe limitations for the value proposition. Alternatively, creating diverse demand markets and revenue streams for the recovered almost-pure CO2 may prevail over CO2 sequestration option and improve the economic feasibility of this climate change mitigation approach. As such, research in the carbon capture and management field is seen to be shifting towards CO2 utilization, directly and indirectly, in energy and chemical industries. In this paper, we have critically reviewed the literature on carbon capture, conversion, and utilization routes and assessed the progress in the research and developments in this direction. Both physical and chemical CO2 utilization pathways are studied and the principles of key routes are identified. The literature is also probed in addressing the process integration scenarios and the performance assessment benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thring, M. W. (1977) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1977.0180 · Cited by 7,338
Griggs, D. J., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,754
IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage
Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., de Coninck, H., Loos, M., & Meyer, L. (2021) · Cited by 4,875
Amine Scrubbing for CO 2 Capture
Rochelle, G. T. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176731 · Cited by 4,440
Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review
Götz, M., Lefebvre, J., Mörs, F., McDaniel Koch, A., Graf, F., Bajohr, S., Reimert, R., & Kolb, T. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 · Cited by 2,573
Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation
Thauer, R. K., Kaster, A.-K., Seedorf, H., Buckel, W., & Hedderich, R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1931 · Cited by 2,184
A review of dry (CO2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts
Pakhare, D., & Spivey, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60395d · Cited by 2,159
Rao, A. B., & Rubin, E. S. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0158861 · Cited by 1,838
Song, C. (2006) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2006.02.029 · Cited by 1,809
Olah, G. A., Goeppert, A., & Prakash, G. K. S. (2009) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo801260f · Cited by 1,605
Cited by
(2020) · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109620 · Cited by 1,160
Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review
Osman, A. I., Hefny, M., Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A., Elgarahy, A. M., & Rooney, D. W. (2021) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3 · Cited by 862
Metadata
- Authors
- Rafiee, A., Rajab Khalilpour, K., Milani, D., & Panahi, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5771-5794
- ISSN
- 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
- 2213-3437
- OpenAlex
- W2890155765
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 208
- FWCI
- 25.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in CO2 conversion and utilization: A review from process systems perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.065
- The paper
- Rafiee, A., Rajab Khalilpour, K., Milani, D., & Panahi, M. (2018). Trends in CO2 conversion and utilization: A review from process systems perspective. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.