The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Status and prospect of garnet/polymer solid composite electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries
Abstract
Abstract Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs), such as polyethylene oxide (PEO), are characteristic of good flexibility and excellent processability, but they suffer from low ionic conductivity and small Li+ transference number at ambient temperature. Inorganic solid electrolytes (ISEs), garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 and its derivatives (LLZO-based) in particular, possess high ionic conductivity at room temperature, wide electrochemical stability window, large Li+ transference number as well as good stability against Li metal anode. Nevertheless, lithium dendrites growth, interfacial contact issue and brittle nature of LLZO-based ceramic electrolytes prevent their practical applications. In response to these shortcomings, LLZO-based/polymer solid composite electrolytes (SCEs), taking complementary advantages of two kinds of electrolytes, and thus simultaneously improving the electrode wettability, ionic conductivity and mechanical strength, have been made to develop high-performance SCEs in recent years. Herein, the intrinsic properties and research progress of LLZO-based/polymer SCEs, including LLZO-based/PEO SCEs (LLZO-based/PEO SCEs with uniform dispersion of LLZO-based fillers and LLZO-based/PEO layered SCEs) and LLZO-based/novel polymers SCEs, are summarized. Besides, comprehensive updates on their applications in solid-state batteries are also presented. Finally, challenges and perspectives of LLZO-based/polymer SCEs for advanced all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) are suggested. This review paper aims to provide systematic research progress of LLZO-based/polymer SCEs, to allow for more efficient and target-oriented research on improving LLZO-based/polymer SCEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
A solid future for battery development
Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 · Cited by 3,979
Cited by
Ionic Conduction in Polymer‐Based Solid Electrolytes
Li, Z., Fu, J., Zhou, X., Gui, S., Wei, L., Yang, H., Li, H., & Guo, X. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202201718 · Cited by 678
Sulfide and Oxide Inorganic Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li Batteries: A Review
Reddy, M. V., Julien, C. M., Mauger, A., & Zaghib, K. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10081606 · Cited by 331
Advanced energy materials for flexible batteries in energy storage: A review
Kong, L., Tang, C., Peng, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · SmartMat · doi:10.1002/smm2.1007 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Deng, Y., & Chen, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Energy Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 154-177
- ISSN
- 2095-4956 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011658338
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Status and prospect of garnet/polymer solid composite electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.017
- The paper
- Li, L., Deng, Y., & Chen, G. (2020). Status and prospect of garnet/polymer solid composite electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Journal of Energy Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.