The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form
Abstract
Conditional heteroskedasticity is an important feature of many macroeconomic and financial time series. Standard residual-based bootstrap procedures for dynamic regression models treat the regression eroor as i.i.d. These procedures are invalid in the presence of conditional heteroskedasticity. We establish the asymptotic validity of three easy-to-implement alternative bootstrap proposals for stationary autoregressive processes with m.d.s. errors subject to possible conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. These proposals are the fixed-design wild bootstrap, the recursive design wild bootstrap and the pairwise bootstrap. In a simulation study all three procedures tend to be more accurate in small samples than the conventional large-sample approximation based on robust standard errors. In contrast, standard residual-based bootstrap methods for models with i.i.d. errors may be very inaccurate if the i.i.d. assumption is violated. We conclude that in many empirical applications the proposed robust bootstrap procedures should routinely replace conventional bootstrap procedures based on the i.i.d. error assumption. JEL Classification: C15, C22, C52
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns: Alternative Procedures for Inference and Measurement
Hodrick, R. J. (1992) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/5.3.351 · Cited by 1,523
Engle (1990) · doi:10.1093/rfs/3.1.103 · Cited by 229
Cited by
The Dynamic Effects of Personal and Corporate Income Tax Changes in the United States
Mertens, K., & Ravn, M. O. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.4.1212 · Cited by 1,019
Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return
Kelly, B. T., Pruitt, S., & Su, Y. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.05.001 · Cited by 809
WHY AGNOSTIC SIGN RESTRICTIONS ARE NOT ENOUGH: UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF OIL MARKET VAR MODELS
Kilian, L., & Murphy, D. P. (2012) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01080.x · Cited by 544
Self-citationOil shocks, policy uncertainty and stock market return
Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2013) · Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money · doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2013.07.001 · Cited by 503
Estimating the effect of a gasoline tax on carbon emissions
Davis, L. W., & Kilian, L. (2011) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.1156 · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonçalves, S., & Kilian, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Econometrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-120
- ISSN
- 0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122904576
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.030
- The paper
- Gonçalves, S., & Kilian, L. (2004). Bootstrapping autoregressions with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.