Cited by 49Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingStatistical Methods and Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Likelihood-based estimation in a panel setting: Robustness, redundancy and validity of copulas

Prokhorov, Artem, Schmidt, Peter·2009·Journal of Econometrics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.06.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prokhorov and Schmidt (2009) consider GMM and copulas in a longitudinal setting although not with discrete outcomes.

    “For example, Prokhorov and Schmidt (2009) consider GMM and copulas in a longitudinal setting although not with discrete outcomes.”

    From Dependence modeling of multivariate longitudinal hybrid insurance data with dropout (2021) · cites this paper as Prokhorov and Schmidt (2009)

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 49

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Bouyé, E., Durrleman, V., Nikeghbali, A., Riboulet, G., Roncalli, T., 2000. Copulas for finance: A reading guide and some applications. Crédit Lyonnais Working Paper. http://gro.creditlyonnais.fr/content/wp/copula-survey.pdf · DOI
  2. Breusch, 1999, Redundancy of moment conditions, Journal of Econometrics, 91, 89, 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00050-5 · DOI
  3. Breymann, 2003, Dependence structures for multivariate high-frequency data in finance, Quantitative Finance, 3, 1, 10.1080/713666155 · DOI
  4. Cameron, 2004, Modelling the differences in counted outcomes using bivariate copula models with application to mismeasured counts, Econometrics Journal, 7, 10.1111/j.1368-423X.2004.00144.x · DOI
  5. Chen, 2006, Estimation of copula-based semiparametric time series models, Journal of Econometrics, 130, 307, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.03.004 · DOI
  6. Chen, 2006, Efficient estimation of semiparametric multivariate copula models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1228, 10.1198/016214506000000311 · DOI
  7. Cherubini, 2004, Copula methods in finance, 10.1002/9781118673331 · DOI
  8. Embrechts, 2003, Using copulae to bound the value-at-risk for functions of dependent risks, Finance and Stochastics, 7, 145, 10.1007/s007800200085 · DOI
  9. Frank, 1979, On the simultaneous associativity of f(x,y) and x+y−f(x,y), Aequationes Mathematicae, 19, 194, 10.1007/BF02189866 · DOI
  10. Godambe, 1960, An optimum property of regular maximum likelihood estimation, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 31, 1208, 10.1214/aoms/1177705693 · DOI
  11. Godambe, 1976, Conditional likelihood and unconditional optimum estimating equations, Biometrika, 63, 277, 10.1093/biomet/63.2.277 · DOI
  12. Hansen, 1982, Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators, Econometrica, 50, 1029, 10.2307/1912775 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lee, 1983, Generalized econometric models with selectivity, Econometrica, 51, 507, 10.2307/1912003 · DOI
  14. Nelsen, 1999, An introduction to copulas, vol. 139
  15. Newey, 1987, Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation, International Economic Review, 28, 777, 10.2307/2526578 · DOI
  16. Patton, 2006, Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence, International Economic Review, 47, 527, 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00387.x · DOI
  17. Sklar, 1959, Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges, Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 8, 229
  18. Smith, 2003, Modelling sample selection using archimedian copulas, Econometrics Journal, 6, 99, 10.1111/1368-423X.00101 · DOI
  19. Tauchen, 1985, Diagnostic testing and evaluation of maximum likelihood models, Journal of Econometrics, 30
  20. Trivedi, 2007, Copula modeling: An introduction for practitioners, vol. 1
  21. Wooldridge, 1991, Specification testing and quasi-maximum likelihood estimation, Journal of Econometrics, 48, 29, 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90031-8 · DOI
  22. Zimmer, 2006, Using trivariate copulas to model sample selection and treatment effects: Application to family health care demand, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 24, 63, 10.1198/073500105000000153 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Prokhorov, A., & Schmidt, P.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Peter
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
153
Issue
1
Pages
93-104
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074414327
Cited by
49
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
panel data, copulas, maximum likelihood estimation, joint probability distribution, efficiency improvement, robustness, moment conditions, GMM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review