Should we go one step further? An accurate comparison of one-step and two-step procedures in a generalized method of moments framework
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The two-step GMM is more precise and reliable than the one-step estimation method.
“However, the two-step GMM is widely regarded as more precise and reliable compared to the one-step estimation method [18]”
From Financial development and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa using system GMM analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Hwang, J., & Sun, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Yixiao
- Venue
- Journal of Econometrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 381-405
- ISSN
- 0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1668294501
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (SES-1530592)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Keywords
- generalized method of moments, moment conditions, finite sample properties, asymptotic theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
