New electrocardiographic diagnostic criteria for the pathologic R waves in leads V1 and V2 of anatomically lateral myocardial infarction
Abstract
Aims To study the different QRS patterns in leads V1 and V2 in first inferior, lateral, and combined inferolateral myocardial infarction (MI) to recognize which are the ECG criteria that best define the presence of lesions isolated to the anatomically lateral wall of the left ventricle.Methods and results We studied consecutive patients with first inferior (15), lateral (9), or inferolateral (21) MI with reference to contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CE-CRM). We measured the R-wave amplitude and duration, the R/S ratio, and the T-wave amplitude and polarity in leads V1 and V2. The specificity of the V1 criteria for lateral MI, that is, R/S amplitude ratio 1 or greater and R duration 40 milliseconds or longer, is very high but its sensitivity is low. We defined 2 new criteria, R/S of 0.5 or greater and R amplitude in V1 greater than 3 mm, with each achieving a sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 93.3% for lateral/inferolateral MI location.Conclusions (1) New ECG criteria for lateral MI (R/S ratio in V1 > or =0.5 and R amplitude in V1 >3 mm) present very high specificity and lower but very acceptable sensitivity for lateral MI. (2) New criteria based on R waves in V2 or T waves in V1 to V2 do not discriminate between inferior and lateral MI. (3) The classical criteria (R/S amplitude ratio > or =1 and R duration > or =40 ms in V1) attain very high specificity but much lower sensitivity than the new criteria.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New ECG criteria for lateral myocardial infarction (R/S ratio in V1 ≥ 0.5 and R amplitude in V1 > 3 mm) have very high specificity and lower but very acceptable sensitivity for lateral myocardial infarction.
“New ECG criteria for lateral myocardial infarction (R/S ratioo in V 1 ≥ 0.5 and R amplitude in V 1 > 3 mm) present very high specificity and lower but very acceptable sensitivity for lateral myocardial infarction; new criteria based on R waves in V 2 or T waves in V 1 to V 2 do not discriminate between inferior and lateral myocardial infarction.7”
From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [7]
New ECG criteria based on R waves in V2 or T waves in V1 to V2 do not discriminate between inferior and lateral myocardial infarction.
“new criteria based on R waves in V 2 or T waves in V 1 to V 2 do not discriminate between inferior and lateral myocardial infarction.7”
From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- de Luna, A. B., Cino, J., Goldwasser, D., Kotzeva, A., Elosua, R., Carreras, F., Pujadas, S., Garcia-Moll, X., Santaló, M., Fiol, M., Bayés-Genís, A., Pons-Lladó, G., & Cinca, J.
- Affiliations
- Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Son Dureta (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of Electrocardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 413-418
- ISSN
- 0022-0736 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088309044
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Electrocardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- inferior myocardial infarction, R wave amplitude, T wave polarity, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review