Rectification of SEMG as a tool to demonstrate synchronous motor unit activity during vibration
Abstract
The use of surface electromyography (SEMG) in vibration studies is problematic since motion artifacts occupy the same frequency band with the SEMG signal containing information on synchronous motor unit activity. We hypothesize that using a harsher, 80-500 Hz band-pass filter and using rectification can help eliminate motion artifacts and provide a way to observe synchronous motor unit activity that is phase locked to vibration using SEMG recordings only. Multi Motor Unit (MMU) action potentials using intramuscular electrodes along with SEMG were recorded from the gastrocnemius medialis (GM) of six healthy male volunteers. Data were collected during whole body vibration, using vibration frequencies of 30 Hz, 35 Hz, 40 Hz or 50 Hz. A computer simulation was used to investigate the efficacy of filtering under different scenarios: with or without artifacts and/or motor unit synchronization. Our findings indicate that motor unit synchronization took place during WBV as verified by MMU recordings. A harsh filtering regimen along with rectification proved successful in demonstrating motor unit synchronization in SEMG recordings. Our findings were further supported by the results from the computer simulation, which indicated that filtering and rectification was efficient in discriminating motion artifacts from motor unit synchronization. We suggest that the proposed signal processing technique may provide a new methodology to evaluate the effects of vibration treatments using only SEMG. This is a major advantage, as this non-intrusive method is able to overcome movement artifacts and also indicate the synchronization of underlying motor units.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 80-500 Hz band pass filter was used for the SEMG recordings to overcome the mechanical artifact induced by the tap.
“A 5 Hz high pass filter was used for the accelerometer and a 80–500 Hz band pass filter was used for the SEMG recordings to overcome the mechanical artifact induced by the tap (Sebik et al., 2013).”
From Standardization of the Jendrassik maneuver in Achilles tendon tap reflex (2018) · cites this paper as Sebik et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Sebik, O., Karacan, I., Cidem, M., & Türker, K. S.
- Affiliations
- Koç University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Türker, Kemal S.
- ORCID
- Türker, Kemal S.
- Venue
- Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-284
- ISSN
- 1050-6411 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018213711
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Effects of Vibration on Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Keywords
- surface electromyography, whole-body vibration, motor unit synchronization, motion artifacts, bandpass filtering, medial gastrocnemius, vibration frequency, signal processing
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Adult, Algorithms, Axons, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electromyography, Humans, Male, Motion, Motor Neurons, Muscle Contraction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Vibration, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review