Cited by 59Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMuscle activation and electromyography studiesOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Accuracy of the surface electromyography RMS processing for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder

Berni, Kelly Cristina dos Santos, Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira, Pires, Paulo Fernandes, Rodrigues-Bigaton, Delaine·2015·Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Abstract

Due to the multifactor etiology of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), the precise diagnosis remains a matter of debate and validated diagnostic tools are needed. The aim was to determine the accuracy of surface electromyography (sEMG) activity, assessed in the amplitude domain by the root mean square (RMS), in the diagnosis of TMD. One hundred twenty-three volunteers were evaluated using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders and distributed into two groups: women with myogenous TMD (n=80) and women without TMD (n=43). The volunteers were then submitted to sEMG evaluation of the anterior temporalis, masseter and suprahyoid muscles at rest and during maximum voluntary teeth clenching (MVC) on parafilm. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the muscle activity were analyzed. Differences between groups were found in all muscles analyzed at rest as well as in the masseter and suprahyoid muscles during MVC on parafilm. Moderate accuracy (AUC: 0.74-0.84) of the RMS sEMG was found in all muscles regarding the diagnosis of TMD at rest and in the suprahyoid muscles during MVC on parafilm. Moreover, sensitivity ranging from 71.3% to 80% and specificity from 60.5% to 76.6%. In contrast, RMS sEMG did not exhibit acceptable degrees of accuracy in the other masticatory muscles during MVC on parafilm. It was concluded that the RMS sEMG is a complementary tool for clinical diagnosis of the myogenous TMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.05.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berni, K. C. D. S., Dibai-Filho, A. V., Pires, P. F., & Rodrigues-Bigaton, D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Methodist University of Piracicaba (BR)
Corresponding author
Rodrigues-Bigaton, Delaine
Venue
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
596-602
ISSN
1050-6411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1555433492
Cited by
59
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
temporomandibular disorders, myogenous temporomandibular disorders, surface electromyography, root mean square amplitude, diagnostic accuracy, masseter muscle, anterior temporalis muscle, suprahyoid muscles, maximum voluntary clenching, masticatory muscles, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Masseter Muscle, Masticatory Muscles, Neck Muscles, Temporal Muscle, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review