CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesMisinformation and Its ImpactsEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Connecting epistemic injustice and justified belief in health-related conspiracies

Annesley, K.·2020·Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
DOI 10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100545
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100545

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Erosion of trust can cut both ways: marginalized groups may lend less credibility to dominant institutions, disadvantaging those institutions when they dispense knowledge for public good, such as medical advice.

    “The erosion of trust can cut both ways: a marginalized group may lend less credibility to dominant institutions, which puts them at a disadvantage when these institutions try to dispense knowledge for the public good, such as medical advice (Annesley 2020).”

    From Epistemic Injustice in Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as Annesley 2020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Annesley, K.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Annesley, K.
ORCID
Annesley, K.
Venue
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
15
Pages
100545
ISSN
2352-5525 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100545
OpenAlex
W3082610887
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Ethics Medicine and Public Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, women's health, health misinformation, social media, rational belief

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review