Cited by 65CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCoal and Its By-productsWaste Management and Environmental Impact

Comparison of CO2 capture by ex-situ accelerated carbonation and in in-situ naturally weathered coal fly ash

Muriithi, Grace N., Petrik, Leslie F., Fatoba, Olanrewaju, Gitari, Wilson M., Doucet, Frédéric J., Nel, Jaco, Nyale, Sammy M., Chuks, Paul E.·2013·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Natural weathering at coal power plants ash dams occurs via processes such as carbonation, dissolution, co-precipitation and fluid transport mechanisms which are responsible for the long-term chemical, physical and geochemical changes in the ash. Very little information is available on the natural carbon capture potential of wet or dry ash dams. This study investigated the extent of carbon capture in a wet-dumped ash dam and the mineralogical changes promoting CO2 capture, comparing this natural phenomenon with accelerated ex-situ mineral carbonation of fresh fly ash (FA). Significant levels of trace elements of Sr, Ba and Zr were present in both fresh and weathered ash. However Nb, Y, Sr, Th and Ba were found to be enriched in weathered ash compared to fresh ash. Mineralogically, fresh ash is made up of quartz, mullite, hematite, magnetite and lime while weathered and carbonated ashes contained additional phases such as calcite and aragonite. Up to 6.5 wt % CO2 was captured by the fresh FA with a 60% conversion of calcium to CaCO3 via accelerated carbonation (carried out at 2 h, 4Mpa, 90 °C, bulk ash and a S/L ratio of 1). On the other hand 6.8 wt % CO2 was found to have been captured by natural carbonation over a period of 20 years of wet disposed ash. Thus natural carbonation in the ash dumps is significant and may be effective in capturing CO2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.027

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CO2 sequestration using IAC of cement waste at 30 bar and 50 °C would require $136-323 per t-CaCO3, depending on product purity.

    “CO 2 sequestration using IAC of cement waste at 30 bar and 50 1C would require $136-323 per t-CaCO 3 , depending on product purity.147”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muriithi, G. N., Petrik, L. F., Fatoba, O., Gitari, W. M., Doucet, F. J., Nel, J., Nyale, S. M., & Chuks, P. E.
Affiliations
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
  • University of Venda (ZA)
  • Council for Geoscience (ZA)
Corresponding author
Muriithi, Grace N.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
127
Pages
212-220
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971489486
Cited by
65
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
Keywords
CO2 capture, coal fly ash, natural weathering, accelerated carbonation, CO2 mineralization, calcium carbonate formation, trace element enrichment, mineral transformation, carbon sequestration
MeSH terms
Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Environmental Pollution, Power Plants, Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission, Coal Ash

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review