Does human perception of wetland aesthetics and healthiness relate to ecological functioning?
Abstract
Wetland management usually aims at preserving or restoring desirable ecological characteristics or functions. It is now well-recognized that some social criteria should also be included. Involving lay-people in wetland preservation or restoration projects may mean broadening project objectives to fit various and potentially competing requirements that relate to ecology, aesthetics, recreation, etc. In addition, perceived value depends both upon expertise and objectives, both of which vary from one stakeholder population to another. Perceived value and ecological functioning have to be reconciled in order to make a project successful. Understanding the perceptions of lay-people as well as their opinions about ecological value is a critical part of the development of sustainable management plans. Characterizing the environment in a way that adequately describes ecological function while also being consistent with lay perception may help reach such objectives. This goal has been addressed in a case study relating to wetlands of the Ain River (France). A photo-questionnaire presenting a sample of photographs of riverine wetlands distributed along the Ain River was submitted to 403 lay-people and self-identified experts. Two objectives were defined: (1) to identify the different parameters, whether visual or ecological, influencing the perception regarding the value of these ecosystems; (2) to compare the perceptions of self-identified experts and lay-people. Four criteria appear to strongly influence peoples' perceptions of ecological and aesthetical values: water transparency and colour, the presence and appearance of aquatic vegetation, the presence of sediments, and finally, trophic status. In our study, we observed only a few differences in perception. The differences primarily related to the value assigned to oligotrophic wetlands but even here, the differences between lay and expert populations were minimal. These results support the idea that it is possible to implement an integrated and participative management program for ecosystems. Our approach can provide a shared view of environmental value facilitating the work of managers in defining comprehensive goals for wetland preservation or restoration projects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If urban freshwater hydrosystems are strongly polluted, they are seen as a problem rather than an opportunity for restoration.
“If urban freshwater hydrosystems are strongly polluted, they are seen as a problem rather than an opportunity for restoration that can create a place for an encounter with nature, a well-functioning ecosystem, or a site that contributes significantly to human health.”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [81]
Humans tend to perceive polluted water as ugly, smelling, or dangerous, which reduces their interest in hydrosystems and impedes the development of an attitude of care for ecosystems.
“Humans tend to perceive polluted water as ugly, smelling, or dangerous [81], which reduces their interest in hydrosystems and impedes the development of an attitude of”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [81]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 97
- Authors
- Cottet, M., Piégay, H., & Bornette, G.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Cottet, Marylise
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 128
- Pages
- 1012-1022
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979176551
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Wetland Management and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
- Keywords
- wetland health, ecological function, riparian wetlands, Ain River, water transparency, aquatic plants, trophic state, wetland restoration, participatory management, sustainable wetland management
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Esthetics, Expert Testimony, France, Humans, Public Opinion, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recreation, Ecosystem, Wetlands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review