Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decolorization of the metal textile dye Lanaset Grey G by immobilized white-rot fungi

Daâssi, Dalel, Mechichi, Tahar, Nasri, Moncef, Rodriguez-Couto, Susana·2013·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

In this paper we studied the ability of four Tunisian-isolated fungi (i.e. Coriolopsis gallica, Bjerkandera adusta, Trametes versicolor and Trametes trogii) immobilized into Ca-alginate beads to decolorize the metal textile dye Lanaset Grey G (LG). The effect of different operational conditions, such as initial dye concentration, temperature, pH, beads/medium ratio and agitation, on dye decolorization by the immobilized fungi was investigated. Maximal decolorization percentages of 88.7%, 89.3%, 82.1% and 81.3% for C. gallica, B. adusta, T. versicolor and T. trogii were attained, respectively, when operating at an initial LG concentration of 150 mg/L, pH values of 5.0-6.0, temperatures of 40-45 °C and a beads/medium ratio of 20% (w/v) in static conditions after 72 h of incubation. Subsequently, the re-usability of the immobilized fungi was evaluated. After three decolorization cycles, the decolorization percentage of free cell cultures dropped to values below 36%, while decolorization percentages of about 75%, 70%, 60% and 68% were obtained by the immobilized cultures of C. gallica, B. adusta, T. versicolor and T. trogii, respectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.026

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Abdel-Razek, 2011, Removal of chromium ions from liquid waste solutions using immobilized Cunninghamella elegans, Nat. Sci., 9, 211
  2. Vaithanomsat, 2010, Decolorization of reactive dye by white-rot fungus Datronia sp. KAPI0039, Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.), 44, 879
  3. Znidaršič, 2001, The morphology of filamentous fungi in submerged cultivations as a bioprocess parameter, Food Technol. Biotechnol., 39, 237

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Daâssi, D., Mechichi, T., Nasri, M., & Rodriguez-Couto, S.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
129
Pages
324-332
ISSN
0301-4797
Cited by
62
References
42
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.