Nickel phytomining from industrial wastes: growing nickel hyperaccumulator plants on galvanic sludges
Open accessAbstract
Nickel (Ni) is used in numerous industrial processes, with large amounts of Ni-rich industrial wastes produced, which are largely sent to landfill. Nickel recovery from waste materials that would otherwise be disposed is of particular interest. Nickel phytomining represents a new technology in which hyperaccumulator plants are cultivated on Ni-rich substrates for commercial metal recovery. The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of Ni transfer from industrial waste into plant biomass, to support recovery processes from bio-ores. Different industrial galvanic sludges (containing 85-150 g kg-1 Ni) were converted into artificial substrates (i.e. technosols) and the Ni hyperaccumulator Odontarrhena chalcidica (formerly Alyssum murale) was cultivated on these Ni-rich matrices. A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted for three months including an ultramafic soil control and testing fertilized (NPK) and unfertilized replicates. The results showed that fertilization was effective in improving plant biomass for all the substrates and that O. chalcidica was capable of viably growing on technosols, producing a comparable biomass to O. chalcidica on the control (ultramafic soil). On all technosols, O. chalcidica achieved Ni shoot concentrations of more than >1000 mg Ni kg -1 and maximum Ni uptake was obtained from one of the technosols (26.8 g kg -1 Ni, unfertilized; 20.2 g kg -1 Ni, fertilized). Nickel accumulation from three of the technosols resulted to be comparable with the control ultramafic soil. This study demonstrated the feasibility of transferring Ni from toxic waste into the biomass of Odontarrhena chalcidica and that phytomining from galvanic sludge-derived technosols can provide similar Ni yields as from natural ultramafic soils.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At present, proof of concept for metal recovery is well established for Ni; for other metals, it is either not thoroughly investigated or not economically feasible.
“It is worth mentioning that at present, the proof of concept for metal recovery is well established for Ni; however, for other metals, it is either not thoroughly investigated or not economically feasible (Akinbile et al., 2021; Rosenkranz et al., 2017; Tognacchini et al., 2020).”
From Sustainability of phytoremediation: Post-harvest stratagems and economic opportunities for the produced metals contaminated biomass (2023) · cites this paper as Tognacchini et al., 2020
Cites
Improving the Agronomy of<i>Alyssum murale</i>for Extensive Phytomining: A Five-Year Field Study
Bani, A., Echevarria, G., Sulçe, S., & Morel, J. L. (2015) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2013.862204 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khan, A. H. A., Kiyani, A., Santiago-Herrera, M., Ibáñez, J., Yousaf, S., Iqbal, M., Martel-Martín, S., & Barros, R. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116700 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Sustainable management of post-phytoremediation biomass
Mukherjee, S., Leri, A. C., Bandaranayaka, C., Vázquez-Núñez, E., Barros, R., Khan, A. H. A., Zhou, P., Zhang, T., Bernal, M. P., Clemente, R., et al. (2025) · Energy, Ecology and Environment · doi:10.1007/s40974-025-00364-w · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“One study by Tognacchini et al. (2020) used Odontarrhenachalcidica (a flowering plants in the Brassicaceae family with small, yellow flowers) for the hyper accumulation of Ni, yielding biomass with a concentration of 20.2 g Ni kg - 1 dried biomass, making a bio-ore of 2%, which is more concentrated…”
Influential
- Authors
- Tognacchini, A., Rosenkranz, T., van der Ent, A., Machinet, G. E., Echevarria, G., & Puschenreiter, M.
- Affiliations
- BOKU University (AT)
- Laboratoire Sols et Environnement (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Tognacchini, Alice
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 254
- Pages
- 109798
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2987564660
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
- Keywords
- nickel hyperaccumulator plants, Odontarrhena chalcidica, galvanic sludge, industrial waste recycling, Technosols, NPK fertilization, ultramafic soils, metal recovery from waste
- MeSH terms
- Biodegradation, Environmental, Industrial Waste, Nickel, Sewage, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Brassicaceae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review