Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries

Wang, Shuhong, He, Yuqing, Song, Malin·2021·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

The production and trade activities of global value chains (GVC) increasingly contribute to the gross domestic product (GDP) of developing countries. However, while the development of domestic economies brings about technological progress, it also may have negative consequences such as environmental pollution. Technological progress can be conducive to reducing pollution emissions. Our motive is to realize the dual effects of technological progress and energy saving and emission reduction in developing countries' participation in the global value chain through research on GVC, technological progress and environmental pollution. Improving environmental quality through technological advances and reducing the adverse effects of inequality in trade status, enabling developing countries to obtain dividends from participating in the value chain as much as possible, and mitigating the adverse effects of environmental pollution during development. And lay the policy foundation for developing countries to go green. However, most of the current researches focus on the relationship between GVC and technological progress or GVC and environmental pollution, and the research on the relationship between the three is scarce. We use the WIOD database to try to find the relationship between developing country global value chain participation, technological progress and environmental pollution. Wang's method for GVC embedding is adopted for empirical research on input and output, energy utilization, high-skilled labor ratio, and pollution emissions in five typical developing countries, namely, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and Mexico. The relationships among the degree of participation in GVC, technological progress, and environmental pollution is studied from the perspective of industries in each country. The outcomes indicate that there is a value chain threshold in developing countries. When the degree of participation in a value chain is lower than the threshold, technological progress can result in an increase in pollution; otherwise, technological progress can reduce emissions. These results provide a theoretical basis and practical suggestions for developing countries to realize their own energy conservation, emission reductions, and green development while participating in globalized value chains. However, because the data related to the WIOD database is limited to 1995-2009, there are a few flaws in data integrity, which is also a challenge we face.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110999

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., He, Y., & Song, M.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
277
Pages
110999
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087967555
Cited by
268
References
44
FWCI
27.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110999
The paper
Wang, S., He, Y., & Song, M. (2021). Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110999

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.