CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation effect of municipal solid waste mandatory sorting policy in Shanghai

Wang, Yao, Shi, Yu, Zhou, Jizhi, Zhao, Jun, Maraseni, Tek, Qian, Guangren·2021·Journal of Environmental Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113512
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In Shanghai, the biggest metropolis in China, the source classification of domestic waste began in the 1990s but achieved little success over the past thirty years. Surprisingly, the compulsory classification provision of Shanghai residents' domestic waste since 2019 has been successful. In this work, the overall status, and challenges of municipal solid waste (MSW) management in Shanghai under compulsory waste sorting rules are investigated. We tracked the classification efficiency of municipal solid waste, physicochemical characteristics of separated waste, and the carbon emissions arising from waste disposal system. It was found that almost 83.62 % of household food waste has been effectively separated with high purity of 99.50 %, while the lower heating value (LHV) of residual waste was increased by 96.4 % compared to previous years. With effective waste classification, the net carbon emission of separated processing was reduced to 0.11 ton CE/ton waste. However, this system generated some negative outcomes as well such as the lower recovery value of metal in bottom ash and the higher chloride content in fly ash. Moreover, we have documented and discussed several challenges of sustainable waste management system in Shanghai in the text. In order to overcome those challenges, we recommend to: (i) establish a finer source separation and recycling system; (ii) develop highly-efficient resource recovery technologies of byproducts from waste disposal system; and (iii) propose…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113512

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Chen, 2020, Performance analysis and operation strategy of an improved waste-to-energy system incorporated with a coal-fired power unit based on feedwater heating, Appl. Therm. Eng., 178, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115637 · DOI
  2. Chen, 2020, Carbon emissions under different domestic waste treatment modes induced by garbage classification: case study in pilot communities in Shanghai, China, Sci. Total Environ., 717, 137193, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137193 · DOI
  3. Chen, 2012, Removal of chloride from MSWI fly ash, J. Hazard Mater., 237–238, 116, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.08.010 · DOI
  4. Deshpande, 2020, Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: a case study of Norway, Sci. Total Environ., 719, 137353, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137353 · DOI
  5. Fan, 2018, Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: energy and carbon emission footprint, J. Environ. Manag., 223, 888, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.005 · DOI
  6. Gundupalli, 2017, A review on automated sorting of source-separated municipal solid waste for recycling, Waste Manag., 60, 56, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Guo, 2017, Analysis on carbon dioxide emission reduction during the anaerobic synergetic digestion technology of sludge and kitchen waste: taking kitchen waste synergetic digestion project in Zhenjiang as an example, Waste Manag., 69, 360, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.033 · DOI
  8. He, 2020, What affects Chinese households' behavior in sorting solid waste? A case study from shanghai, Shenyang, and Chengdu, Sustainability, 12, 10.3390/su12218831 · DOI
  9. Kinnarinen, 2013, Removal of chloride from fly ash produced in hazardous waste incineration by leaching and displacement washing in a vertical filter press, Waste Manag. Res., 31, 178, 10.1177/0734242X12471098 · DOI
  10. Li, 2020, Research on the characteristics and resource utilization of food waste in Shanghai, Landscape Arch., 6, 25
  11. Li, 2019, Garbage source classification performance, impact factor, and management strategy in rural areas of China: a case study in Hangzhou, Waste Manag., 89, 313, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.020 · DOI
  12. Lima, 2018, Environmental assessment of existing and alternative options for management of municipal solid waste in Brazil, Waste Manag., 78, 857, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.007 · DOI
  13. Marangon, 2021, A life cycle assessment of energy recovery using briquette from wastewater grown microalgae biomass, J. Environ. Manag., 285, 112171, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112171 · DOI
  14. Meng, 2019, Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents' household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 140, 224, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.021 · DOI
  15. Michel Devadoss, 2020, Implications of municipal solid waste management on greenhouse gas emissions in Malaysia and the way forward, Waste Manag., 119, 135, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.038 · DOI
  16. Nie, 2020, Resident risk attitude analysis in the decision-making management of waste incineration construction, J. Environ. Manag., 258, 109946, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109946 · DOI
  17. Ozkan, 2015, A new classification scheme of plastic wastes based upon recycling labels, Waste Manag., 35, 29, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.030 · DOI
  18. Vlachokostas, 2021, Multi-criteria decision analysis towards promoting Waste-to-Energy management strategies: a critical review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 138, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110563 · DOI
  19. Wang, 2020, Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive driven municipal solid waste management for a city in England, Waste Manag., 102, 452, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.009 · DOI
  20. Wang, 2020, From intention to behavior: comprehending residents' waste sorting intention and behavior formation process, Waste Manag., 113, 41, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.031 · DOI
  21. Xiao, 2018, An overview of China's recyclable waste recycling and recommendations for integrated solutions, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134, 112, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.032 · DOI
  22. Xiao, 2020, Policy impacts on Municipal Solid Waste management in Shanghai: a system dynamics model analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 262, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121366 · DOI
  23. Xu, 2017, External influences on forming residents' waste separation behaviour: evidence from households in Hangzhou, China, Habitat Int., 63, 21, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.009 · DOI
  24. Yue, 2019, Rapid evaluation of leaching potential of heavy metals from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash, J. Environ. Manag., 238, 144, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.098 · DOI
  25. Zhang, 2010, Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges, J. Environ. Manag., 91, 1623, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.012 · DOI
  26. Zhang, 2021, Determinants affecting residents' waste classification intention and behavior: a study based on TPB and A-B-C methodology, J. Environ. Manag., 290, 112591, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Shi, Y., Zhou, J., Zhao, J., Maraseni, T., & Qian, G.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
298
Pages
113512
ISSN
0301-4797
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113512
Cited by
113
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1906900)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review