CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 129Wastewater Treatment and ReuseMembrane Separation TechnologiesWater and Wastewater Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Oilfield-produced water treatment using conventional and membrane-based technologies for beneficial reuse: A critical review

Samuel, Ojo, Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan, Kamaludin, Roziana, Sinsamphanh, Oulavanh, Abdullah, Huda, Puteh, Mohd Hafiz, Kurniawan, Tonni Agustiono, Li, Tao, Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi, Rahman, Mukhlis A., Jaafar, Juhana, El-badawy, Tijjani, Chinedu Mamah, Stanley·2022·Journal of Environmental Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114556
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Oilfield produced water (OPW) is one of the most important by-products, resulting from oil and gas exploration. The water contains a complex mixture of organic and inorganic compounds such as grease, dissolved salt, heavy metals as well as dissolved and dispersed oils, which can be toxic to the environment and public health. This article critically reviews the complex properties of OPW and various technologies for its treatment. They include the physico-chemical treatment process, biological treatment process, and physical treatment process. Their technological strengths and bottlenecks as well as strategies to mitigate their bottlenecks are elaborated. A particular focus is placed on membrane technologies. Finally, further research direction, challenges, and perspectives of treatment technologies for OPW are discussed. It is conclusively evident from 262 published studies (1965-2021) that no single treatment method is highly effective for OPW treatment as a stand-alone process however, conventional membrane-based technologies are frequently used for the treatment of OPW with the ultrafiltration (UF) process being the most used for oil rejection form OPW and oily waste water. After membrane treatment, treated effluents of the OPW could be reused for irrigation, habitant and wildlife watering, microalgae production, and livestock watering. Overall, this implies that target pollutants in the OPW samples could be removed efficiently for subsequent use, despite its complex properties. In general, it is however important to note that feed quality, desired quality of effluent, cost-effectiveness, simplicity of process are key determinants in choosing the most suitable treatment process for OPW treatment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114556

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oil firms have sought to adapt enhanced drilling technologies to deploy direct lithium extraction in oilfield brines, including produced water from hydraulic fracturing and tar sands tailings ponds.

    “oil firms have sought to adapt enhanced drilling technologies to deploy DLE in oilfield brines, including produced water from hydraulic fracturing and tar sands tailings ponds”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Samuel et al., 2022

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 212

  1. Aas, 2000, PAH metabolites in bile, cytochrome P4501A and DNA adducts as environmental risk parameters for chronic oil exposure: a laboratory experiment with Atlantic cod, Aquat. Toxicol., 51, 241, 10.1016/S0166-445X(00)00108-9 · DOI
  2. Abadi, 2011, Ceramic membrane performance in microfiltration of oily wastewater, Desalination, 265, 222, 10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.055 · DOI
  3. Abetz, 2021, Fabrication and function of polymer membranes, Chem. Teach. Int., 10.1515/cti-2020-0023 · DOI
  4. Agarwal, 2013, Cleaning of biologically fouled membranes with self-collapsing microbubbles, Biofouling, 29, 69, 10.1080/08927014.2012.746319 · DOI
  5. Ahmad, 2014, Chemical cleaning of a cross-flow microfiltration membrane fouled by microalgal biomass, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 45, 233, 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.06.018 · DOI
  6. Ahmad, 2020, Current advances in membrane technologies for produced water desalination, Desalination, 493, 114643, 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114643 · DOI
  7. Al-Amoudi, 2010, Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: a review, Desalination, 259, 1, 10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.003 · DOI
  8. Al-Ghouti, 2019, Produced water characteristics, treatment and reuse: a review, J. Water Proc. Eng., 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Rodriguez, 2020, vol. 12
  10. Ali, 2018, Evaluation of integrated microfiltration and membrane distillation/crystallization processes for produced water treatment, Desalination, 434, 161, 10.1016/j.desal.2017.11.035 · DOI
  11. Alkhudhiri, 2013, Produced water treatment: application of air gap membrane distillation, Desalination, 309, 46, 10.1016/j.desal.2012.09.017 · DOI
  12. Alley, 2011, Chemical and physical characterization of produced waters from conventional and unconventional fossil fuel resources, Chemosphere, 85, 74, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.043 · DOI
  13. Alpatova, 2014, Treatment of oil sands process-affected water with ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: effects of operating conditions on membrane performance, Separ. Purif. Technol., 122, 170, 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.11.005 · DOI
  14. Alslaibi, 2012, Review: comparison of agricultural byproducts activated carbon production methods using surface area response, Awam Int. Conf. Civ. Eng. (AICCE’12), Penang, Malaysia, 528
  15. Alzahrani, 2014, Challenges and trends in membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: a review, J. Water Proc. Eng., 4, 107, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.09.007 · DOI
  16. Alzahrani, 2013, Identification of foulants, fouling mechanisms and cleaning efficiency for NF and RO treatment of produced water, Separ. Purif. Technol., 118, 324, 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.016 · DOI
  17. Anari, 2019, Surface modification of PVDF membranes for treating produced waters by direct contact membrane distillation, Separ. Purif. Technol., 224, 388, 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.05.032 · DOI
  18. Andreozzi, 2018, Treatment of saline produced water through photocatalysis using rGO-TiO2 nanocomposites, Catal. Today, 315, 194, 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.048 · DOI
  19. Arthur, 2011, Management of produced water from oil and gas wells, Work. Doc. NPC North Am. Resour. Dev. Study, 2, 1
  20. Asatekin, 2009, Oil industry wastewater treatment with fouling resistant membranes containing amphiphilic comb copolymers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4487, 10.1021/es803677k · DOI
  21. Ashoor, 2016, Principles and applications of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): a comprehensive review, Desalination, 398, 222, 10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.043 · DOI
  22. Atoufi Hossein, 2021, Membrane desalination to prepare produced water for reuse, World Environ. Water Resour. Congr. 2020
  23. Azetsu-Scott, 2007, Precipitation of heavy metals in produced water: influence on contaminant transport and toxicity, Mar. Environ. Res., 63, 146, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.08.001 · DOI
  24. Aziz, 2019, Pretreated aluminium dross waste as a source of inexpensive alumina-spinel composite ceramic hollow fibre membrane for pretreatment of oily saline produced water, Ceram. Int., 45, 2069, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.110 · DOI
  25. Bagheri, 2018, Optimal selection of an integrated produced water treatment system in the upstream of oil industry, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 117, 67, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.010 · DOI
  26. Bakke, 2013, Environmental impacts of produced water and drilling waste discharges from the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry, Mar. Environ. Res., 92, 154, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.09.012 · DOI
  27. Barbot, 2013, Spatial and temporal correlation of water quality parameters of produced waters from devonian-age shale following hydraulic fracturing, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2562, 10.1021/es304638h · DOI
  28. Barukčić, 2014, Effect of pore size and process temperature on flux, microbial reduction and fouling mechanisms during sweet whey cross-flow microfiltration by ceramic membranes, Int. Dairy J., 39, 8, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.05.002 · DOI
  29. Beyer, 1979, Biological oxidation of dissolved compounds in oilfield-produced water, J. Petrol. Technol., 31, 241, 10.2118/7128-PA · DOI
  30. Bhadja, 2012, Status of the seawater quality at few industrially important coasts of Gujarat (India) off Arabian Sea, India. J. Geo. Mar. Sci., 41, 90
  31. Bixler, 2012, Review article: biofouling: lessons from nature, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 370, 2381, 10.1098/rsta.2011.0502 · DOI
  32. Cai, 2013, Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: status and prospects, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 19, 360, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.030 · DOI
  33. Çakmakce, 2008, Desalination of produced water from oil production fields by membrane processes, Desalination, 222, 176, 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.147 · DOI
  34. Carls, 2008, Fish embryos are damaged by dissolved PAHs, not oil particles, Aquat. Toxicol., 88, 121, 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.03.014 · DOI
  35. Casaday, 1993, Advances in flotation unit design for produced water treatment, Prod. Oper. Symp., 581
  36. Chai, 2012, Effects of concentration polarization, temperature and pressure on ultrasound detection of inorganic fouling and cleaning in a spiral-wound membrane module, Desalin. Water Treat., 50, 411, 10.1080/19443994.2012.744718 · DOI
  37. Chang, 2019, The DFT study on Rh–C bond dissociation enthalpies of (iminoacyl)rhodium(III)hydride and (iminoacyl)rhodium(III)alkyl, Tetrahedron Lett., 60, 310, 10.1016/j.tetlet.2018.12.042 · DOI
  38. Chang, 2019, Potential and implemented membrane-based technologies for the treatment and reuse of flowback and produced water from shale gas and oil plays: a review, Desalination, 455, 34, 10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.001 · DOI
  39. Chang, 2019, Evaluating the performance of gravity-driven membrane filtration as desalination pretreatment of shale gas flowback and produced water, J. Membr. Sci., 587, 117187, 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117187 · DOI
  40. Chisti, 2007, Biodiesel from microalgae, Biotechnol. Adv., 25, 294, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Cluff, 2014, Temporal changes in microbial ecology and geochemistry in produced water from hydraulically fractured marcellus shale gas wells, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 6508, 10.1021/es501173p · DOI
  42. Coday, 2014, Forward osmosis: novel desalination of produced water and fracturing flowback, J. AWWA (Am. Water Works Assoc.), 106, E55
  43. Coday, 2014, The sweet spot of forward osmosis: treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams, Desalination, 333, 23, 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.014 · DOI
  44. Comninellis, 2008, Perspective Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: advances and trends for R&D, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 83, 769, 10.1002/jctb.1873 · DOI
  45. Corbatón-Báguena, 2014, Cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with BSA by means of saline solutions, Separ. Purif. Technol., 125, 1, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.035 · DOI
  46. Deriszadeh, 2010, Produced water treatment by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1767, 10.1021/es902862j · DOI
  47. Dickhout, 2017, Produced water treatment by membranes: a review from a colloidal perspective, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 487, 523, 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.013 · DOI
  48. Dolan, 2018, Assessing the feasibility of using produced water for irrigation in Colorado, Sci. Total Environ., 640–641, 619, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.200 · DOI
  49. Dórea, 2007, Analysis of BTEX, PAHs and metals in the oilfield produced water in the State of Sergipe, Brazil, Microchem. J., 85, 234, 10.1016/j.microc.2006.06.002 · DOI
  50. Drews, 2010, Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures, J. Membr. Sci., 363, 1, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.046 · DOI
  51. Duong, 2015, Treatment of RO brine from CSG produced water by spiral-wound air gap membrane distillation - a pilot study, Desalination, 366, 121, 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.026 · DOI
  52. Durako, 1993, Assessment of the toxicity of Kuwait crude oil on the photosynthesis and respiration of seagrasses of the northern Gulf, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 27, 223, 10.1016/0025-326X(93)90028-I · DOI
  53. Dwyer, 2016, Treatment of oil & gas produced water, Sandia Natl. Lab., 30
  54. Ebrahimi, 2009, Characterization and application of different ceramic membranes for the oil-field produced water treatment, Desalination, 245, 533, 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.017 · DOI
  55. Ebrahimi, 2010, Investigations on the use of different ceramic membranes for efficient oil-field produced water treatment, Desalination, 250, 991, 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.088 · DOI
  56. Ebrahimi, 2018, Evaluation of the fouling potential of ceramic membrane configurations designed for the treatment of oilfield produced water, Separ. Sci. Technol., 53, 349, 10.1080/01496395.2017.1386217 · DOI
  57. Ebrahimi, 2020, Innovative optical-sensing technology for the online fouling characterization of silicon carbide membranes during the treatment of oily water, Sensors, 20, 10.3390/s20041161 · DOI
  58. Echchelh, 2018, Reusing oil and gas produced water for irrigation of food crops in drylands, Agric. Water Manag., 206, 124, 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.006 · DOI
  59. Ekins, 2007, Zero emissions of oil in water from offshore oil and gas installations: economic and environmental implications, J. Clean. Prod., 15, 1302, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.07.014 · DOI
  60. El-badawy, 2022, Progress in treatment of oilfield produced water using membrane distillation and potentials for beneficial re-use, Separ. Purif. Technol., 278, 119494, 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119494 · DOI
  61. El-Samak, 2020, Designing flexible and porous fibrous membranes for oil water separation—a review of recent developments, Polym. Rev., 60, 671, 10.1080/15583724.2020.1714651 · DOI
  62. Ellsworth, 2013, Inject. Ind. Earthq., 341, 1
  63. Emani, 2014, Microfiltration of oil-water emulsions using low cost ceramic membranes prepared with the uniaxial dry compaction method, Ceram. Int., 40, 1155, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.06.117 · DOI
  64. Estrada, 2016, A review of the issues and treatment options for wastewater from shale gas extraction by hydraulic fracturing, Fuel, 182, 292, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.051 · DOI
  65. Ezugbe, 2020, Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: a review, Membranes, 10
  66. Fakhru’l-Razi, 2009, Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment, J. Hazard Mater., 170, 530, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044 · DOI
  67. Firouzjaei, 2018, Exploiting synergetic effects of graphene oxide and a silver-based metal–organic framework to enhance antifouling and anti-biofouling properties of thin-film nanocomposite membranes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10, 42967, 10.1021/acsami.8b12714 · DOI
  68. Firouzjaei, 2018, A novel nanocomposite with superior antibacterial activity: a silver-based metal organic framework embellished with graphene oxide, Adv. Mater. Interfac., 5, 1701365, 10.1002/admi.201701365 · DOI
  69. Freeman, 2011, What's the buzz about ceramic membranes?, J. AWWA (Am. Water Works Assoc.), 103, 12, 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2011.tb11572.x · DOI
  70. Freire, 2001, Biological treatment of oil field wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor, Environ. Technol., 22, 1125, 10.1080/09593332208618203 · DOI
  71. Gao, 2011, Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: a review, Desalination, 272, 1, 10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051 · DOI
  72. Gasperi, 2012, Treatment of combined sewer overflows by ballasted flocculation: removal study of a large broad spectrum of pollutants, Chem. Eng. J., 211–212, 293, 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.025 · DOI
  73. Greenlee, 2009, Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges, Water Res., 43, 2317, 10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010 · DOI
  74. Gregory, 2011, Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing, Elements, 7, 181, 10.2113/gselements.7.3.181 · DOI
  75. Günther, 2000, Wastewater treatment by greywater separation: outline for a biologically based greywater purification plant in Sweden, Ecol. Eng., 15, 139, 10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00040-3 · DOI
  76. Guo, 2012, A mini-review on membrane fouling, Bioresour. Technol., 122, 27, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.089 · DOI
  77. Guo, 2018, An ultrafiltration reverse osmosis combined process for external reuse of Weiyuan shale gas flowback and produced water, Environ. Sci. Water Res., 4, 942, 10.1039/C8EW00036K · DOI
  78. Hajibabania, 2012, Relative impact of fouling and cleaning on PVDF membrane hydraulic performances, Separ. Purif. Technol., 90, 204, 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.001 · DOI
  79. Hansen, 1994, Review of potential technologies for the removal of dissolved components from produced water, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 72, 176
  80. Hayes, 2004, The electrodialysis alternative for produced water management, Gastips, 15
  81. Hedar, 2018, Pollution impact and alternative treatment for produced water, E3S Web. Conf., 31, 1, 10.1051/e3sconf/20183103004 · DOI
  82. Hilal, 2003, Using atomic force microscopy towards improvement in nanofiltration membranes properties for desalination pre-treatment: a review, Desalination, 157, 137, 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00393-X · DOI
  83. Hilal, 2005, Methods employed for control of fouling in MF and UF membranes: a comprehensive review, Separ. Sci. Technol., 40, 1957, 10.1081/SS-200068409 · DOI
  84. Huang, 1993, Advanced chemical oxidation: its present role and potential future in hazardous waste treatment, Waste Manag., 13, 361, 10.1016/0956-053X(93)90070-D · DOI
  85. Huang, 2008, Direct-flow microfiltration of aquasols. I. Impacts of particle stabilities and size, J. Membr. Sci., 314, 90, 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.040 · DOI
  86. Huang, 2014, Evaluation of different algogenic organic matters on the fouling of microfiltration membranes, Desalination, 344, 329, 10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.039 · DOI
  87. Huang, 2020, Performance and process simulation of membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating petrochemical wastewater, Sci. Total Environ., 747, 141311, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141311 · DOI
  88. Hylland, 2008, Water column monitoring near oil installations in the North Sea 2001-2004, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 56, 414, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.11.004 · DOI
  89. Igunnu, 2012, Produced water treatment technologies, Int. J. Low Carbon Technol., 9, 157, 10.1093/ijlct/cts049 · DOI
  90. Incardona, 2004, Defects in cardiac function precede morphological abnormalities in fish embryos exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 196, 191, 10.1016/j.taap.2003.11.026 · DOI
  91. Ivnitsky, 2005, Characterization of membrane biofouling in nanofiltration processes of wastewater treatment, Desalination, 185, 255, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.081 · DOI
  92. Jebur, 2021, Combined electrocoagulation-microfiltration-membrane distillation for treatment of hydraulic fracturing produced water, Desalination, 500, 114886, 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114886 · DOI
  93. Jiang, 2013, Application of ceramic membrane and ion-exchange for the treatment of the flowback water from Marcellus shale gas production, J. Membr. Sci., 431, 55, 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.030 · DOI
  94. Jiménez, 2018, State of the art of produced water treatment, Chemosphere, 192, 186, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139 · DOI
  95. Jiménez, 2018, State of the art of produced water treatment, Chemosphere, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139 · DOI
  96. Johnson, 2016, The identification and mechanism of a Scenedesmus spp. causing bio-fouling of an oil field produced water treatment plant, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 108, 207, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.05.023 · DOI
  97. Judd, 2014, The size and performance of offshore produced water oil-removal technologies for reinjection, Separ. Purif. Technol., 134, 241, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.07.037 · DOI
  98. Kane Driscoll, 2010, A framework for using dose as a metric to assess toxicity of fish to PAHs, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 73, 486, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.11.004 · DOI
  99. Ke, 2013, A review of membrane fouling in municipal secondary effluent reclamation, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 20, 771, 10.1007/s11356-012-1147-y · DOI
  100. Keranen, 2013, Potentially induced earthquakes in Oklahoma: USA: links between wastewater injection and the 2011 Mw 5.7 earthquake sequence, Geology, 41, 699, 10.1130/G34045.1 · DOI
  101. Khan, 2016, Volatile-organic molecular characterization of shale-oil produced water from the Permian Basin, Chemosphere, 148, 126, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.116 · DOI
  102. Kim, 2014, Combined organic and colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: fouling reversibility and the role of applied pressure, J. Membr. Sci., 460, 206, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.038 · DOI
  103. Kimura, 2004, Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water, Water Res., 38, 3431, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.007 · DOI
  104. Kondash, 2015, Water footprint of hydraulic fracturing, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 2, 276, 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00211 · DOI
  105. Kong, 2018, Desalination and fouling of NF/low pressure RO membrane for shale gas fracturing flowback water treatment, Separ. Purif. Technol., 195, 216, 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.017 · DOI
  106. Kovarova, 2013, Alkylphenol ethoxylates and alkylphenols-update information on occurrence, fate and toxicity in aquatic environment, Pol. J. Vet. Sci., 16, 763, 10.2478/pjvs-2013-0111 · DOI
  107. Kusworo, 2018, Oilfield produced water treatment to clean water using integrated activated carbon-bentonite adsorbent and double stages membrane process, Chem. Eng. J., 347, 462, 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.136 · DOI
  108. Lalia, 2013, A review on membrane fabrication: structure, properties and performance relationship, Desalination, 326, 77, 10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.016 · DOI
  109. Lawson, 1996, Membrane distillation. II. Direct contact MD, J. Membr. Sci., 120, 123, 10.1016/0376-7388(96)00141-X · DOI
  110. Li, 2000, NH-3-N removal in wastewater by chemical precipitation and exploration of reaction, Chongqing Environ. Sci., 6
  111. Li, 2006, Treatment of oily wastewater by organic-inorganic composite tubular ultrafiltration (UF) membranes, Desalination, 196, 76, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.11.021 · DOI
  112. Li, 2020, Effective removal of fluorescent microparticles as Cryptosporidium parvum surrogates in drinking water treatment by metallic membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 594, 117434, 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117434 · DOI
  113. Lin, 2014, A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies, J. Membr. Sci., 460, 110, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.034 · DOI
  114. Lin, 2020, Treatment of produced water with photocatalysis: recent advances, affecting factors and future research prospects, Catalysts, 10, 10.3390/catal10080924 · DOI
  115. Liu, 2000, Chemical control of superparamagnetic properties of magnesium and cobalt spinel ferrite nanoparticles through atomic level magnetic couplings, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 6263, 10.1021/ja000784g · DOI
  116. Liu, 2021, A review of treatment technologies for produced water in offshore oil and gas fields, Sci. Total Environ., 775, 145485, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145485 · DOI
  117. López-Rodas, 2008, Adaptation of the chlorophycean Dictyosphaerium chlorelloides to stressful acidic, mine metal-rich waters as result of pre-selective mutations, Chemosphere, 72, 703, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.009 · DOI
  118. Lu, 2009, Biological treatment of oilfield-produced water: a field pilot study, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 63, 316, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.09.009 · DOI
  119. Ludzack, 1965, Tolerance of high salinities by conventional wastewater treatment processes, J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 37, 1404
  120. Ma, 2006, Electrochemical pilot-scale plant for oil field produced wastewater by M/C/Fe electrodes for injection, J. Hazard Mater., 132, 237, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.09.043 · DOI
  121. Macedonio, 2014, Direct contact membrane distillation for treatment of oilfield produced water, Separ. Purif. Technol., 126, 69, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.02.004 · DOI
  122. Martinetti, 2009, High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation, J. Membr. Sci., 331, 31, 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.003 · DOI
  123. Martínez-Huitle, 2014, Application of electrochemical technology for water treatment of Brazilian industry effluents, J. Mex. Chem. Soc., 58, 276
  124. Masten, 1994, Strategies employed to determine the acute aquatic toxicity of ethyl benzene, a highly volatile, poorly water-soluble chemical, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 10.1006/eesa.1994.1027 · DOI
  125. McIntosh, 2005, Volumetrically significant recharge of Pleistocene glacial meltwaters into epicratonic basins: constraints imposed by solute mass balances, Chem. Geol., 222, 292, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.010 · DOI
  126. Meindersma, 2006, Desalination and water recycling by air gap membrane distillation, Desalination, 187, 291, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.088 · DOI
  127. Miller, 2006, Integrated concepts in water reuse: managing global water needs, Desalination, 187, 65, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.068 · DOI
  128. Mondal, 2013, Stimuli responsive surfaces for fouling-resistant polymeric membranes, J. Membr. Sci. Technol., 2
  129. Mondal, 2016, Polymeric membranes for produced water treatment: an overview of fouling behavior and its control, Rev. Chem. Eng., 32, 611, 10.1515/revce-2015-0027 · DOI
  130. Mondal, 2008, Produced water treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 322, 162, 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.039 · DOI
  131. Mondal, 2012, Photo-induced graft polymerization of N-isopropyl acrylamide on thin film composite membrane: produced water treatment and antifouling properties, Separ. Purif. Technol., 90, 231, 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.024 · DOI
  132. Moon, 2020, Can self-assembly address the permeability/selectivity trade-offs in polymer membranes?, Macromolecules, 53, 5649, 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c01111 · DOI
  133. Mozafari, 2019, Facile Cu-BTC surface modification of thin chitosan film coated polyethersulfone membranes with improved antifouling properties for sustainable removal of manganese, J. Membr. Sci., 588, 117200, 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117200 · DOI
  134. Mueller, 1997, Crossflow microfiltration of oily water, J. Membr. Sci., 129, 221, 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00344-4 · DOI
  135. Mukherjee, 2006, Some observations about electrolyte permeation mechanism through reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 278, 301, 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.012 · DOI
  136. Munirasu, 2016, Use of membrane technology for oil field and refinery produced water treatment - a review, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 100, 183, 10.1016/j.psep.2016.01.010 · DOI
  137. Murić, 2014, Comparison of ceramic and polymeric ultrafiltration membranes for treating wastewater from metalworking industry, Chem. Eng. J., 255, 403, 10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.009 · DOI
  138. Murray-Gulde, 2003, Performance of a hybrid reverse osmosis-constructed wetland treatment system for brackish oil field produced water, Water Res., 37, 705, 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00353-6 · DOI
  139. Muruganandham, 2014, Recent developments in heterogeneous catalyzed environmental remediation processes, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 14, 1898, 10.1166/jnn.2014.8718 · DOI
  140. Naim, 2012, Surfactant cleaning of UF membranes fouled by proteins, Separ. Purif. Technol., 94, 39, 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.031 · DOI
  141. Nam, 2013, Evaluation of chemical cleaning efficiency of organic-fouled SWRO membrane by analyzing filtration resistance, Desalin. Water Treat., 51, 6172, 10.1080/19443994.2013.780724 · DOI
  142. Neff, 2006, Oil well produced water discharges to the North Sea. Part II: comparison of deployed mussels (Mytilus edulis) and the DREAM model to predict ecological risk, Mar. Environ. Res., 62, 224, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.03.012 · DOI
  143. NRCS, 1999, vol. 4
  144. Orem, 2014, Organic substances in produced and formation water from unconventional natural gas extraction in coal and shale, Int. J. Coal Geol., 126, 20, 10.1016/j.coal.2014.01.003 · DOI
  145. Ozgun, 2013, Effects of the pre-treatment alternatives on the treatment of oil-gas field produced water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 88, 1576, 10.1002/jctb.4007 · DOI
  146. Padaki, 2015, Membrane technology enhancement in oil-water separation. A review, Desalination, 357, 197, 10.1016/j.desal.2014.11.023 · DOI
  147. Paixão, 2007, Estimating the gasoline components and formulations toxicity to microalgae (Tetraselmis chuii) and oyster (Crassostrea rhizophorae) embryos: an approach to minimize environmental pollution risk, Environ. Res., 103, 365, 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.015 · DOI
  148. Pandey, 2012, Fouling in reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in water recovery from secondary effluent: a review, Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol., 11, 125, 10.1007/s11157-012-9272-0 · DOI
  149. Park, 2017, Maximizing the right stuff: the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity, Science (80-, 356, 1138
  150. Pejman, 2020, In situ Ag-MOF growth on pre-grafted zwitterions imparts outstanding antifouling properties to forward osmosis membranes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12, 36287, 10.1021/acsami.0c12141 · DOI
  151. Pejman, 2020, Improved antifouling and antibacterial properties of forward osmosis membranes through surface modification with zwitterions and silver-based metal organic frameworks, J. Membr. Sci., 611, 118352, 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118352 · DOI
  152. Peña, 2013, Evaluating impact of fouling on reverse osmosis membranes performance, Desalin. Water Treat., 51, 958, 10.1080/19443994.2012.699509 · DOI
  153. Pereira, 2013, Influence of pH on the survival of Dictyosphaerium chlorelloides populations living in aquatic environments highly contaminated with chromium, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 98, 82, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.09.020 · DOI
  154. Qdais, 2004, Removal of heavy metals from wastewater by membrane processes: a comparative study, Desalination, 164, 105, 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00169-9 · DOI
  155. Quagraine, 2005, In situ bioremediation of naphthenic acids contaminated tailing pond waters in the athabasca oil sands region—demonstrated field studies and plausible options: a review, J. Environ. Sci. Heal. Part A, 40, 685, 10.1081/ESE-200046649 · DOI
  156. Rahimpour, 2018, Simultaneous improvement of antimicrobial, antifouling, and transport properties of forward osmosis membranes with immobilized highly-compatible polyrhodanine nanoparticles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 5246, 10.1021/acs.est.8b00804 · DOI
  157. Rahman, 2018, Anaerobic biodegradation of benzene-laden wastewater under mesophilic environment and simultaneous recovery of methane-rich biogas, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 6, 2957, 10.1016/j.jece.2018.04.038 · DOI
  158. Ramon, 2013, Osmosis-assisted cleaning of organic-fouled seawater RO membranes, Chem. Eng. J., 218, 173, 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.006 · DOI
  159. Rosenblum, 2017, Temporal characterization of flowback and produced water quality from a hydraulically fractured oil and gas well, Sci. Total Environ., 369, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.294 · DOI
  160. Saad, 2019, An overview of recent advances in state-of-the-art techniques in the demulsification of crude oil emulsions, Processes, 7, 1, 10.3390/pr7070470 · DOI
  161. Samuel, 2021, WO3–based photocatalysts: a review on synthesis, performance enhancement and photocatalytic memory for environmental applications, Ceram. Int.
  162. Samuel, 2021, WO3–based photocatalysts: a review on synthesis, performance enhancement and photocatalytic memory for environmental applications, Ceram. Int.
  163. Saththasivam, 2016, An overview of oil-water separation using gas flotation systems, Chemosphere, 144, 671, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.087 · DOI
  164. Segner, 2003, Identification of endocrine-disrupting effects in aquatic vertebrates and invertebrates: report from the European IDEA project, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 54, 302, 10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00039-8 · DOI
  165. Seyed Shahabadi, 2014, Optimization of operating conditions in ultrafiltration process for produced water treatment via the full factorial design methodology, Separ. Purif. Technol., 132, 50, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.051 · DOI
  166. Seyedpour, 2020, Tailoring the biocidal activity of novel silver-based metal azolate frameworks, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 8, 7588, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00201 · DOI
  167. Seyedpour, 2020, Toward sustainable tackling of biofouling implications and improved performance of TFC FO membranes modified by Ag-MOF nanorods, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12, 38285, 10.1021/acsami.0c13029 · DOI
  168. Shaffer, 2013, Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: drivers, technologies, and future directions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 9569, 10.1021/es401966e · DOI
  169. Sheikholeslami, 2018, Nanoparticle for degradation of BTEX in produced water; an experimental procedure, J. Mol. Liq., 264, 476, 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.05.096 · DOI
  170. Shen, 2010, Surface chemical functional groups modification of porous carbon, Recent Pat. Chem. Eng., 1, 27, 10.2174/1874478810801010027 · DOI
  171. Shi, 2011, Review of fouling by mixed feeds in membrane filtration applied to water purification, Desalin. Water Treat., 35, 68, 10.5004/dwt.2011.3131 · DOI
  172. Shirazi, 2010, Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes - a critical review, Desalination, 250, 236, 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.056 · DOI
  173. Shirazi, 2014, Production of drinking water from seawater using membrane distillation (MD) alternative: direct contact MD and sweeping gas MD approaches, Desalin. Water Treat., 52, 2372, 10.1080/19443994.2013.797367 · DOI
  174. Sirivedhin, 2004, Reclaiming produced water for beneficial use: salt removal by electrodialysis, J. Membr. Sci., 243, 335, 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.038 · DOI
  175. Sturve, 2006, Effects of North Sea oil and alkylphenols on biomarker responses in juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), Aquat. Toxicol., 78, 73, 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.02.019 · DOI
  176. Su, 2007, Kinetic performance of oil-field produced water treatment by biological aerated filter, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 15, 591, 10.1016/S1004-9541(07)60129-3 · DOI
  177. Subramani, 2011, Recovery optimization of membrane processes for treatment of produced water with high silica content, Desalin. Water Treat., 36, 297, 10.5004/dwt.2011.2604 · DOI
  178. Sundt, 2011, Effects of produced water on reproductive parameters in prespawning atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A, 543, 10.1080/15287394.2011.550563 · DOI
  179. Syarifah Nazirah, 2017, Ulasan mengenai rawatan sisa medan minyak menggunakan teknologi membran penapisan berbanding teknologi konvensional, Malaysian J. Anal. Sci., 21, 643
  180. Takáčová, 2015, Degradation of btex by microalgae Parachlorella kessleri, Pet. Coal, 57, 101
  181. Takht Ravanchi, 2009, Application of membrane separation processes in petrochemical industry: a review, Desalination, 235, 199, 10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.042 · DOI
  182. Tellez, 2002, Performance evaluation of an activated sludge system for removing petroleum hydrocarbons from oilfield produced water, Environ. Prog., 6, 455
  183. Thomas, 2009, Effect-directed identification of naphthenic acids as important in vitro xeno-estrogens and anti-androgens in North Sea offshore produced water discharges, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 8066, 10.1021/es9014212 · DOI
  184. Tomer, 2009, Modification of nanofiltration membranes by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization for produced water filtration, Separ. Sci. Technol., 44, 3346, 10.1080/01496390903212540 · DOI
  185. Vajner, 2016, Thickness identification of epitaxial Bi 2 Te 3 via optical contrast, 2D Mater., 3, 21010, 10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/021010 · DOI
  186. Valladares Linares, 2012, NOM and TEP fouling of a forward osmosis (FO) membrane: foulant identification and cleaning, J. Membr. Sci., 421–422, 217, 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.07.019 · DOI
  187. van der Sman, 2012, Review of hypotheses for fouling during beer clarification using membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 396, 22, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.051 · DOI
  188. Venkatesan, 2017, Produced water desalination: an exploratory study, Desalination, 404, 328, 10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.013 · DOI
  189. Wan, 2013, Ultrasound irradiation combined with hydraulic cleaning on fouled polyethersulfone and polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, Environ. Technol., 34, 2929, 10.1080/09593330.2012.701235 · DOI
  190. Wandera, 2012, Modification of ultrafiltration membranes with block copolymer nanolayers for produced water treatment: the roles of polymer chain density and polymerization time on performance, J. Membr. Sci., 403–404, 250, 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.061 · DOI
  191. Wang, 2015, Recent advances in membrane distillation processes: membrane development, configuration design and application exploring, J. Membr. Sci., 474, 39, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.09.016 · DOI
  192. Wang, 2021, Polyethylene-supported nanofiltration membrane with in situ formed surface patterns of millimeter size in resisting fouling, J. Membr. Sci., 620, 118830, 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118830 · DOI
  193. Wang, 2009, A review of membrane fouling in MBRs: characteristics and role of sludge cake formed on membrane surfaces, Separ. Sci. Technol., 44, 3571, 10.1080/01496390903182578 · DOI
  194. Wang, 2011, Fouling of microfiltration membranes by organic polymer coagulants and flocculants: controlling factors and mechanisms, Water Res., 45, 357, 10.1016/j.watres.2010.08.009 · DOI
  195. Wang, 2013, Ultrasound-assisted chemical cleaning of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane fouled by lactic acid fermentation broth, Desalination, 326, 103, 10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.010 · DOI
  196. Warner, 2014, New tracers identify hydraulic fracturing fluids and accidental releases from oil and gas operations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 12552, 10.1021/es5032135 · DOI
  197. Wei, 2019, Treatment of petrochemical wastewater and produced water from oil and gas, Water Environ. Res., 91, 1025, 10.1002/wer.1172 · DOI
  198. Wen, 2019, Polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water treatment: a review, Environ. Chem. Lett., 17, 1539, 10.1007/s10311-019-00895-9 · DOI
  199. Witze, 2015, Artificial quakes shake Oklahoma, Nature, 520, 418, 10.1038/520418a · DOI
  200. Xu, 2008, Beneficial use of co-produced water through membrane treatment: technical-economic assessment, Desalination, 225, 139, 10.1016/j.desal.2007.04.093 · DOI

200 of 212 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Samuel, O., Othman, M. H. D., Kamaludin, R., Sinsamphanh, O., Abdullah, H., Puteh, M. H., Kurniawan, T. A., Li, T., Ismail, A. F., Rahman, M. A., Jaafar, J., El-badawy, T., & Chinedu Mamah, S.
Affiliations
  • Federal Polytechnic, Mubi (NG)
  • University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
  • National University of Laos (LA)
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Southeast University (CN)
Corresponding author
Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
308
Pages
114556
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114556
OpenAlex
W4210674510
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water and Wastewater Treatment
Keywords
produced water, produced water treatment, membrane technology, ultrafiltration, oily wastewater, heavy metals, biological treatment, physicochemical treatment, water reuse, irrigation water, microalgae cultivation, livestock water supply, treatment process selection
MeSH terms
Animals, Ultrafiltration, Water Purification, Livestock, Oil and Gas Fields, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review