CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phytomanagement of textile wastewater for dual biogas and biochar production: A techno-economic and sustainable approach

Msemwa, Gelasius Gregory, Ibrahim, Mona G., Fujii, Manabu, Nasr, Mahmoud·2022·Journal of Environmental Management
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116097
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Phytoremediation has been widely employed for industrial effluent treatment due to its cost-effectiveness and eco-friendliness. However, this process generates large amounts of exhausted plant biomass, requiring appropriate management strategies to avoid further environmental pollution. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to address the recyclability of water hyacinth after textile wastewater (TWW) phytoremediation for dual biogas and biochar production. A hydroponic culture system was occupied by 163 g (plant mass) per L (TWW) and operated under 16:8 h light:dark cycle (sunlight), 70-80% relative humidity, and 22-25 °C temperature. This water hyacinth-based system achieved chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonia nitrogen (NH 4 + -N), and dye removal efficiencies of 58.60 ± 2.63%, 35.27 ± 1.65%, and 38.49 ± 2.24%, respectively, at a TWW fraction of 100 %v/v. The plant characterization study revealed that phytoabsorption and phytoextraction could be the main mechanisms involved in TWW pollution reduction. The lignin and hemicellulose of water hyacinth were slightly degraded during phytoremediation, making the cellulose fibers simply accessible to enzymes' attack in the subsequent anaerobic digestion process. This hypothesis was validated by increasing the crystallinity index from 50.13% to 60.21% during TWW phytoremediation. The spent plant was cleaned and then co-digested (37 °C) with cow dung at 1:1 (w/w, dry basis) for bioenergy production. The gene…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116097

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Abudi, 2016, Effects of pretreatments on thickened waste activated sludge and rice straw co-digestion: experimental and modeling study, J. Environ. Manag., 177, 213, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.028 · DOI
  2. Agbede, 2022, Benefits of biochar, poultry manure and biochar–poultry manure for improvement of soil properties and sweet potato productivity in degraded tropical agricultural soils, Resour. Environ. Sustain., 7
  3. Ajouguim, 2019, Modifications of Alfa fibers by alkali and hydrothermal treatment, Cellulose, 26, 1503, 10.1007/s10570-018-2181-9 · DOI
  4. Alp Arici, 2022, Highly reusable plant-based biosorbent for the selective methylene blue biosorption from dye mixture in aqueous media, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 1849, 10.1007/s13762-021-03238-w · DOI
  5. Arutselvy, 2020, Sequential valorization strategies for dairy wastewater and water hyacinth to produce fuel and fertilizer, J. Food Process. Eng.
  6. Asrofi, 2018, Isolation of nanocellulose from water hyacinth fiber (WHF) produced via digester-sonication and its characterization, Fibers Polym., 19, 1618, 10.1007/s12221-018-7953-1 · DOI
  7. Atukunda, 2022, Dual biogas/biochar production from anaerobic co-digestion of petrochemical and domestic wastewater: a techno-economic and sustainable approach, Biomass Convers. Biorefin.
  8. Awad, 2019, Adsorption of organic pollutants by natural and modified clays: a comprehensive review, Separ. Purif. Technol., 228, 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115719 · DOI
  9. Barua, 2018, Microbial pretreatment of water hyacinth for enhanced hydrolysis followed by biogas production, Renew. Energy, 126, 21, 10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.028 · DOI
  10. Biswas, 2020, Application of chitosan-clay biocomposite beads for removal of heavy metal and dye from industrial effluent, J. Compos. Sci., 4, 16, 10.3390/jcs4010016 · DOI
  11. Bortoloti, 2022, Phytoremediation of toxic heavy metals by Brassica plants: a biochemical and physiological approach, Environ. Adv., 8, 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100204 · DOI
  12. Cai, 2015, Influence of alkali treatment on internal microstructure and tensile properties of abaca fibers, Ind. Crop. Prod., 65, 27, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.048 · DOI
  13. Das, 2015, Optimization of enzymatic saccharification of water hyacinth biomass for bio-ethanol: comparison between artificial neural network and response surface methodology, Sustain. Mater. Technol., 3, 17
  14. Djalma Nunes Ferraz Júnior, 2016, Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of raw sugarcane vinasse, Renew. Energy, 89, 245, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.064 · DOI
  15. Ezz, 2021, Dual biogas and biochar production from rice straw biomass: a techno-economic and sustainable development approach, Biomass Convers. Biorefin.
  16. Ferdeş, 2020, Microorganisms and enzymes used in the biological pretreatment of the substrate to enhance biogas production: a review, Sustainability, 12, 7205, 10.3390/su12177205 · DOI
  17. Horschig, 2019, From Paris agreement to business cases for upgraded biogas: analysis of potential market uptake for biomethane plants in Germany using biogenic carbon capture and utilization technologies, Biomass Bioenergy, 120, 313, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.022 · DOI
  18. Imron, 2021, Potential of Lemna minor for removal of methylene blue in aqueous solution: kinetics, adsorption mechanism, and degradation pathway, Environ. Technol. Innovat., 24
  19. Islam, 2020, Silicon-mediated plant defense against pathogens and insect pests, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 168, 10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104641 · DOI
  20. Jin, 2019, Co-pyrolysis of rice straw and water hyacinth: characterization of products, yields and biomass interaction effect, Biomass Bioenergy, 127, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105281 · DOI
  21. Kazadi Mbamba, 2015, A systematic study of multiple minerals precipitation modelling in wastewater treatment, Water Res., 85, 359, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.041 · DOI
  22. Khandare, 2015, Phytoremediation of textile dyes and effluents: current scenario and future prospects, Biotechnol. Adv., 33, 1697, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.09.003 · DOI
  23. Kumar, 2021, Protein-driven biomineralization: comparing silica formation in grass silica cells to other biomineralization processes, J. Struct. Biol., 213, 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107665 · DOI
  24. Kumar, 2020, Experimental and kinetics studies for biogas production using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] solms) and sugar mill effluent, Waste Biomass Valorization, 11, 109, 10.1007/s12649-018-0412-9 · DOI
  25. Liew, 2020, Enzymatic pretreatment to enhance anaerobic bioconversion of high strength wastewater to biogas: a review, Sci. Total Environ., 713, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136373 · DOI
  26. Mahata, 2021, Removal of ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) by Cu-loaded amino-functionalized adsorbents, Chem. Eng. J., 411, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128589 · DOI
  27. Mansour, 2022, Dried Brown seaweed's phytoremediation potential for methylene blue dye removal from aquatic environments, Polymers, 14, 1375, 10.3390/polym14071375 · DOI
  28. Mottet, 2009, Kinetics of thermophilic batch anaerobic digestion of thermal hydrolysed waste activated sludge, Biochem. Eng. J., 2, 46
  29. Mthethwa, 2018, Utilization of Pistia stratiotes (aquatic weed) for fermentative biohydrogen: electron-equivalent balance, stoichiometry, and cost estimation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 8243, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.099 · DOI
  30. Mulat, 2018, Microbial biogas production from hydrolysis lignin: insight into lignin structural changes, Biotechnol. Biofuels, 11, 61, 10.1186/s13068-018-1054-7 · DOI
  31. Mustafa, 2021, Biosynthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and its effects along with calcium phosphate on physicochemical attributes of wheat under drought stress, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 223, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112519 · DOI
  32. Nasar, 2019, Application of polyaniline-based adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater—a review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 26, 5333, 10.1007/s11356-018-3990-y · DOI · Paper page
  33. Nasr, 2018, Modeling applications in environmental bioremediation studies, Phytobiont and Ecosystem Restitution, 143, 10.1007/978-981-13-1187-1_7 · DOI
  34. Nasr, 2021, Dual production of hydrogen and biochar from industrial effluent containing phenolic compounds, Fuel, 301, 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121087 · DOI
  35. Negi, 2022, Nitrogen removal via anammox process in constructed wetland – a comprehensive review, Chem. Eng. J., 437, 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135434 · DOI
  36. Ong, 2010, Treatment of azo dye Acid Orange 7 containing wastewater using up-flow constructed wetland with and without supplementary aeration, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 9049, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.034 · DOI
  37. Patil, 2014, Anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth and sheep waste, Energy Proc., 52, 572, 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.07.112 · DOI
  38. Qin, 2020, Responses of phytoremediation in urban wastewater with water hyacinths to extreme precipitation, J. Environ. Manag., 271, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110948 · DOI
  39. Ramzan, 2022, Biodegradation and decolorization of Reactive Red 2 azo dye by Paramecium jenningsi and Paramecium multimicronucleatum in industrial wastewater, Biomass Convers. Biorefin.
  40. Sharma, 2021, Removal of organic dyes from wastewater using Eichhornia crassipes: a potential phytoremediation option, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 28, 7116, 10.1007/s11356-020-10940-8 · DOI
  41. Srivastava, 2017, Plant–microbe interaction in aquatic system and their role in the management of water quality: a review, Appl. Water Sci., 7, 1079, 10.1007/s13201-016-0415-2 · DOI
  42. Tambunan, 2018, Phytoremediating batik wastewater using Vetiver Chrysopogon zizanioides (L), Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 27, 1281, 10.15244/pjoes/76728 · DOI
  43. Tasnim, 2017, Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure with kitchen waste and Water Hyacinth, Renew. Energy, 109, 434, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.044 · DOI
  44. Tawfik, 2021, 2-biofuels (H2 and CH4) production from anaerobic digestion of biscuits wastewater: experimental study and techno-economic analysis, J. Water Proc. Eng., 39
  45. Tawfik, 2021, Fermentation-based nanoparticle systems for sustainable conversion of black-liquor into biohydrogen, J. Clean. Prod., 309, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127349 · DOI
  46. Umaru, 2018, Application of plant-microbe interactions in contaminated agroecosystem management, Phytobiont and Ecosystem Restitution, 63, 10.1007/978-981-13-1187-1_4 · DOI
  47. Wan, 2016, Cost–benefit calculation of phytoremediation technology for heavy-metal-contaminated soil, Sci. Total Environ., 563–564, 796, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.080 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Wang, 2018, Enzyme pretreatment enhancing biogas yield from corn stover: feasibility, optimization, and mechanism analysis, J. Agric. Food Chem., 66, 10026, 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03086 · DOI
  49. Yadvika Yadav, 2006, A modified method for estimation of chemical oxygen demand for samples having high suspended solids, Bioresour. Technol., 97, 721, 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.013 · DOI
  50. Yao, 2011, Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: characterization and phosphate removal potential, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 6273, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Yaseen, 2018, Treatment of synthetic textile wastewater containing dye mixtures with microcosms, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25, 1980, 10.1007/s11356-017-0633-7 · DOI
  52. Yin, 2019, Biochar produced from the co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and walnut shell for ammonium and phosphate adsorption from water, J. Environ. Manag., 249, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109410 · DOI
  53. Zala, 2020, Experimental investigation on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and water hyacinth in batch type reactor under mesophilic condition, Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 10, 707, 10.1007/s13399-019-00522-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Msemwa, G. G., Ibrahim, M. G., Fujii, M., & Nasr, M.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
322
Pages
116097
ISSN
0301-4797
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116097
Cited by
44
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytomanagement of textile wastewater for dual biogas and biochar production: A techno-economic and sustainable approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116097
The paper
Msemwa, G. G., Ibrahim, M. G., Fujii, M., & Nasr, M. (2022). Phytomanagement of textile wastewater for dual biogas and biochar production: A techno-economic and sustainable approach. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116097