Zn-modified biochar coupled with biological nitrification inhibitors mitigates nitrous oxide emissions from alkaline soil through modulation of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms
Abstract
Biochar (BC) has generally been employed to mitigate the nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions from agricultural soils, but its response is soil-dependent. Thereby, in soil with proficient nitrification tendency, Zn-modified BC coupled with biological nitrification inhibitors (BNIs) could be more effective in mitigating N 2 O emissions. The effects of coupled application of Zn-modified biochar and BNIs on N 2 O emission and its underlying microbial mechanism remain largely unknown. In our study, a 24-day incubation experiment was established representing nine treatments; with three biochars amendments using three settings of BNIs, referred to as: 1) control (without amendment/inhibitor, 2) control with methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) acrylate -MHPA, 3) control with methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) Propionate-MHPP, 4) pristine BC without inhibitor, 5) pristine BC with MHPA, 6) pristine BC with MHPP, 7) Zn-modified BC without inhibitor, 8) Zn-modified BC with MHPA, 9) Zn-modified BC with MHPP, all at agronomically recommended dosage. N dynamics were evaluated following the addition of urea. The inclusion of Zn-modified BC in combination with MHPA and MHPP substantially reduced N 2 O emissions by 94.52% and 96.85% relative to control. Quantification of N-cycling genes indicated that the treatment without BC amendment stimulated the growth of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) across the entire incubation period. The input of Zn-BC with MHPA and MHPP substantially inhibited the population of AOA and AOB. LEfSe cladogram elucidated the distinct shift in bacterial assemblage across the treatments. Overall, our results demonstrated that Zn-modified BC + MHPP played a key role in the dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing functional microbiome and N turnover, potentially considerably mitigating N 2 O emissions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38
- Authors
- Laila, U., Zeng, Y., Tan, C., Nazir, A., Abbas, T., Bareen, F.-E., Kammann, C., Farwa, U., & Liang, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of the Punjab (PK)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Hochschule Geisenheim University (DE)
- University of Management and Technology (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Nazir, Aisha
- Liang, Yongchao
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-11
- Volume
- 419
- Pages
- 131238
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7223684289
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- HEC Pakistan
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Keywords
- nitrous oxide emissions, biological nitrification inhibitors, ammonia-oxidizing archaea, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, nitrification, alkaline soils, nitrogen cycling genes, soil amendment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review