To reduce and not to reduce resource consumption? That is two questions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initiatives aimed at educating consumers have only limited impact when evaluated in relation to actual behavioral change.
“their impact has been shown to be only limited when evaluated in relation to actual behavioral change (e.g., Cappellini and Pearson, 2012;Hebrok and Heidenstrøm, 2019;Richetin et al., 2012;Watson and Meah, 2012).”
From "The road to food waste is paved with good intentions": When consumers' goals inhibit the minimization of household food waste (2019) · cites this paper as Richetin et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Conner, M., Adjali, I., Hurling, R., Sengupta, A., & Greetham, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Lloyd's (GB)
- Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University of Reading (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Richetin, Juliette
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 112-122
- ISSN
- 0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090166485
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 18.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- resource consumption reduction, theory of planned behavior, intention, ecological dimension, environmental behaviour, discriminant validity, incremental validity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
