Medicinal smoke reduces airborne bacteria
Abstract
This study represents a comprehensive analysis and scientific validation of our ancient knowledge about the effect of ethnopharmacological aspects of natural products' smoke for therapy and health care on airborne bacterial composition and dynamics, using the Biolog microplate panels and Microlog database. We have observed that 1h treatment of medicinal smoke emanated by burning wood and a mixture of odoriferous and medicinal herbs (havan sámagri=material used in oblation to fire all over India), on aerial bacterial population caused over 94% reduction of bacterial counts by 60 min and the ability of the smoke to purify or disinfect the air and to make the environment cleaner was maintained up to 24h in the closed room. Absence of pathogenic bacteria Corynebacterium urealyticum, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, Enterobacter aerogenes (Klebsiella mobilis), Kocuria rosea, Pseudomonas syringae pv. persicae, Staphylococcus lentus, and Xanthomonas campestris pv. tardicrescens in the open room even after 30 days is indicative of the bactericidal potential of the medicinal smoke treatment. We have demonstrated that using medicinal smoke it is possible to completely eliminate diverse plant and human pathogenic bacteria of the air within confined space.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fumigation as a source of cleansing or purging air and atmosphere is a well-accepted fact.
“Moreover, fumigation as a source of cleansing or purging the air and atmosphere is a well-accepted fact [43].”
From A Fumigation-Based Surface Sterilization Approach for Plant Tissue Culture (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Fumigation-Based Surface Sterilization Approach for Plant Tissue Culture
Sivanesan, I., Muthu, M., Gopal, J., Tasneem, S., Kim, D.-H., & Oh, J.-W. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18052282 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“Moreover, fumigation as a source of cleansing or purging the air and atmosphere is a well-accepted fact [43].”
Background
- Authors
- Nautiyal, C. S., Chauhan, P. S., & Nene, Y. L.
- Affiliations
- National Botanical Research Institute (IN)
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Nautiyal, Chandra Shekhar
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 446-451
- ISSN
- 0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132136176
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
- Keywords
- airborne bacteria, air disinfection, bactericidal activity, ethnopharmacology, wood smoke, pathogenic bacteria, air purification
- MeSH terms
- Air Microbiology, Bacteria, Plants, Medicinal, Smoke, Ethnopharmacology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review