Neuroprotective potential of Ayahuasca and untargeted metabolomics analyses: applicability to Parkinson's disease
Open accessAbstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY RELEVANCE Ayahuasca is a tea produced through decoction of Amazonian plants. It has been used for centuries by indigenous people of South America. The beverage is considered to be an ethnomedicine, and it is traditionally used for the treatment of a wide range of diseases, including neurological illness. Besides, some scientific evidence suggests it may be applicable to Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. Thus, Ayahuasca deserves in depth studies to clarify its potential role in this disease. AIM OF THE STUDY This study aimed to use an untargeted metabolomics approach to evaluate the neuroprotective potential of the Ayahuasca beverage, the extracts from its matrix plants (Banisteriopsis caapi and Psychotria viridis), its fractions and its main alkaloids on the viability of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in an in vitro PD model. MATERIAL AND METHODS The cytotoxicity of Ayahuasca, crude extracts, and fractions of B. caapi and P. viridis, as well as neuroprotection promoted by these samples in a 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced neurodegeneration model, were evaluated by the MTT assay at two time-points: 48 h (T1) and 72 h (T2). The main alkaloids from Ayahuasca matrix plants, harmine (HRE) and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), were also isolated and evaluated. An untargeted metabolomics approach was developed to explore the chemical composition of samples with neuroprotective activity. Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Electrospray Ionisation and Time-of-Flight (UPLC-ESI-TOF) metabolome data was treated and further analysed using multivariate statistical analyses (MSA): principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The metabolites were dereplicated using the Dictionary of Natural Products and an in house database. The main alkaloids were also quantified by UPLC-MS/MS. RESULTS The samples did not cause cytotoxicity in vitro and three of samples intensely increased cell viability at T1. The crude extracts, alkaloid fractions and HRE demonstrated remarkable neuroprotective effect at T2 while the hydroalcoholic fractions demonstrated this neuroprotective effect at T1 and T2. Several compounds from different classes, such as β-carbolines and monoterpene indole alkaloids (MIAs) were revealed correlated with this property by MSA. Additionally, a total of 2419 compounds were detected in both ionisation modes. HRE showed potent neuroprotective action at 72 h, but it was not among the metabolites positively correlated with the most efficacious neuroprotective profile at either time (T1 and T2). Furthermore, DMT was statistically important to differentiate the dataset (VIP value > 1), although it did not exhibit sufficient neuroprotective activity by in vitro assay, neither a positive correlation with T1 and T2 neuroprotective profile, which corroborated the MSA results. CONCLUSION The lower doses of the active samples stimulated neuronal cell proliferation and/or displayed the most efficacious neuroprotection profile, namely by preventing neuronal damage and improving cell viability against 6-OHDA-induced toxicity. Intriguingly, the hydroalcoholic fractions exhibited enhanced neuroprotective effects when compared to other samples and isolated alkaloids. This finding corroborates the significance of a holistic approach. The results demonstrate that Ayahuasca and its base plants have potential applicability for PD treatment and the possibility to prevent its progression differently from current drugs to treat PD.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Acute effects of repeated administration of DMT and ayahuasca were investigated in vitro, and suggest stimulation of neuroplasticity at a (sub)cellular level.
“Acute effects of repeated administration of DMT and ayahuasca were investigated in vitro, and suggest stimulation of neuroplasticity at a (sub)cellular level (41, 44).”
From Psychedelics and Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review Unraveling the Biological Underpinnings of Psychedelics. (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
The Methods (section 2.6; page unavailable) describe repeated, every-24-hour treatment of cultured SH-SY5Y cells with ayahuasca or DMT for 48 or 72 hours. The Results (section 3.3; page unavailable) report increased cell proliferation with one ayahuasca sample, but do not establish stimulation of neuroplasticity by DMT; they report that isolated DMT lacked sufficient neuroprotective activity in the assay. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLow doses of ayahuasca (1.5 and 2.5 μg/mL) increased cell viability (±70%) compared to non-stressed controls after 48 h, whereas cell viability was decreased after a high dose (10.5 μg/mL) at 72 h post-administration.
“Low doses of ayahuasca (1.5 and 2.5 μg/mL) increased cell viability (±70%) compared to non-stressed controls after 48 h, whereas cell viability was decreased after a high dose (10.5μg/mL) at 72 h post-administration (44).”
From Psychedelics and Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review Unraveling the Biological Underpinnings of Psychedelics. (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
Section 3.3 reports increased viability after 48 hours with some ayahuasca doses and neuroprotection at low doses (1.5 and 2.5 μg/mL). It does not establish the claimed approximately 70% increase over non-stressed controls. It also reports slightly reduced viability with high-dose AYA 2 at 48 hours, not the claimed 72 hours; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEvidence from in vitro studies (n = 5) suggests that psychedelics stimulate molecular and cellular neuroplasticity.
“Evidence from in vitro studies (n = 5) suggests that psychedelics stimulate molecular and cellular neuroplasticity (41–44, 53).”
From Psychedelics and Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review Unraveling the Biological Underpinnings of Psychedelics. (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
Section 3.3 (page unavailable) reports that ayahuasca and plant extracts stimulated proliferation of SH-SY5Y cells in vitro, supporting the cellular part of the claim. It does not establish molecular neuroplasticity in this experiment; the DYRK1A mechanism discussed there is a finding reported from another study. The count of five refers to the citing sentence’s five sources, not to this paper alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn cultured human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells (n = 3) exposed to neurotoxic stress using 6-OHDA, cell viability was differentially changed after treatment with ayahuasca (1, 1.5, 2.5, or 10 μg/mL) every 24 h, and incubation for 48 and 72 h.
“In cultured human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells (n = 3) exposed to neurotoxic stress using 6-OHDA, cell viability was differentially changed after treatment with ayahuasca (1, 1.5, 2.5, or 10 μg/mL) every 24 h, and incubation for 48 and 72 h (44).”
From Psychedelics and Neuroplasticity: A Systematic Review Unraveling the Biological Underpinnings of Psychedelics. (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 62
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [4]4. Callaway, J.C., Brito, G.S., Neves, E.S., 2005. Phytochemical analyses of Banisteriopsis caapi and Psychotria viridis. J. Psychoact. Drugs 37, 145-150. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02791072.2005.10399795.
- [53]53. Pires, A.P.S., Oliveira, C.D.R., Yonamine, M., 2010. Ayahuasca: a review of pharmaco- logical and toxicological aspects. Rev. ciências Farm. básica e Apl. 31, 15-23.
- [58]58. Santos, R.G. dos, 2010. The pharmacology of ayahuasca: a review. Brasília méd 47, 188-195.
- [63]63. Shao, Y., Le, W., 2019. Recent Advances and Perspectives of Metabolomics-Based Investigations in Parkinson ' S Disease, vol. 2. pp. 1-12.
- [69]69. Tseng, W., Hsu, Y., Pan, T., 2016. Function NTU 568-fermented rice extracts on in SH- SY5Y cells and the rat model of. Food Funct 7, 752-762. https://doi.org/10.1039/ c5fo00976f.
- [74]74. Widelski, J., 2017. Chapter 9. Alkaloids, Pharmacognosy. Elsevier Inchttps://doi.org/10. 1016/B978-0-12-802104-0.00009-3.
- Authors
- Katchborian-Neto, A., Santos, W. T., Nicácio, K. J., Corrêa, J. O. A., Murgu, M., Martins, T. M. M., Gomes, D. A., Goes, A. M., Soares, M. G., Dias, D. F., Chagas-Paula, D. A., & Paula, A. C. C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Alfenas (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Paula, Ana C.C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 255
- Pages
- 112743
- ISSN
- 0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012509924
- Semantic Scholar
- d640fc37a000d055b8e9a0004f316b96e3d44cee
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (427497/2018-3)
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (APQ 03701-17, APQ-00443-18, APQ-01954-18, APQ-02353-17)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Synthesis and bioactivity of alkaloids
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
- Keywords
- ayahuasca, Parkinson's disease, neuroprotection, Banisteriopsis caapi, Psychotria viridis, harmine, N,N-dimethyltryptamine, 6-hydroxydopamine neurotoxicity, SH-SY5Y cells, cytotoxicity, untargeted metabolomics, β-carbolines, monoterpene indole alkaloids
- MeSH terms
- Antiparkinson Agents, Cell Survival, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Humans, Neurons, Plant Extracts, Polysaccharides, Least-Squares Analysis, Oxidopamine, Neuroprotective Agents, Ethnopharmacology, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Principal Component Analysis, Banisteriopsis, Psychotria, Cell Line, Tumor, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Metabolomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review