The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of effluent concentration in a wastewater treatment plant using machine learning models
Open accessAbstract
Of growing amount of food waste, the integrated food waste and waste water treatment was regarded as one of the efficient modeling method. However, the load of food waste to the conventional waste treatment process might lead to the high concentration of total nitrogen (T-N) impact on the effluent water quality. The objective of this study is to establish two machine learning models-artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs), in order to predict 1-day interval T-N concentration of effluent from a wastewater treatment plant in Ulsan, Korea. Daily water quality data and meteorological data were used and the performance of both models was evaluated in terms of the coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliff efficiency (NSE), relative efficiency criteria (drel). Additionally, Latin-Hypercube one-factor-at-a-time (LH-OAT) and a pattern search algorithm were applied to sensitivity analysis and model parameter optimization, respectively. Results showed that both models could be effectively applied to the 1-day interval prediction of T-N concentration of effluent. SVM model showed a higher prediction accuracy in the training stage and similar result in the validation stage. However, the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ANN model was a superior model for 1-day interval T-N concentration prediction in terms of the cause-and-effect relationship between T-N concentration and modeling input values to integrated food waste and waste water treatment. This study suggested the efficient and robust nonlinear time-series modeling method for an early prediction of the water quality of integrated food waste and waste water treatment process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566
An overview of statistical learning theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.788640 · Cited by 6,266
Learning internal representations by error propagation
RUMELHART, D. E., HINTON, G. E., & WILLIAMS, R. J. (1988) · Readings in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50035-2 · Cited by 3,002
Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment
Krause, P., Boyle, D. P., & Bäse, F. (2005) · Advances in Geosciences · doi:10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005 · Cited by 2,809
Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. II: Hydrologic Applications
ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2000)5:2(124 · Cited by 1,339
A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models
van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2006) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008 · Cited by 1,223
Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction
Lek, S., & Guégan, J. F. (1999) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(99)00092-7 · Cited by 889
Neural Networks for Statistical Modeling
Smith, M. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 762
Artificial neural network modeling of the river water quality—A case study
Singh, K. P., Basant, A., Malik, A., & Jain, G. (2009) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.01.004 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Wastewater treatment plant performance analysis using artificial intelligence – an ensemble approach
Nourani, V., Elkiran, G., & Abba, S. I. (2018) · Water Science and Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2018.477 · Cited by 282
Rodríguez-Rángel, H., Arias, D. M., Morales-Rosales, L. A., Gonzalez-Huitron, V., Valenzuela Partida, M., & García, J. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15072500 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, H., Jeong, K., Lim, J., Jo, J., Kim, Y. M., Park, J.-P., Kim, J. H., & Cho, K. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 90-101
- ISSN
- 1001-0742 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049125224
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of effluent concentration in a wastewater treatment plant using machine learning models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.007
- The paper
- Guo, H., Jeong, K., Lim, J., Jo, J., Kim, Y. M., Park, J.-P., Kim, J. H., & Cho, K. H. (2015). Prediction of effluent concentration in a wastewater treatment plant using machine learning models. Journal of Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.