Cited by 21Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and Health

The rating of perceived exertion is not different at the ventilatory threshold in sedentary women with different body mass indices

Open access
Elsangedy, Hassan Mohamed, Krinski, Kleverton, Costa, Eduardo Caldas, Haile, Luke, Fonteles, Andre Igor, Timossi, Luciana da Silva, Gregorio da Silva, Sergio·2013·Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness

Abstract

The ventilatory threshold (VT), or respiratory compensation point, is an important respiratory-metabolic marker of aerobic fitness. Exercise at VT intensity provides an optimal stimulus for body mass loss and improvement in aerobic fitness. The use of ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) to self-regulate exercise intensity is more feasible than prescribing exercise using oxygen consumption (V˙O2) and heart rate (HR). Identifying RPE at the VT (RPEVT) is an optimal intensity target for perceptually regulated exercise. The aim of this study was to compare the RPEVT among normal body mass, overweight, and obese sedentary women, according to body mass index (BMI). Each participant performed a maximal graded treadmill test, where RPE, pulmonary ventilation, V˙O2, carbon dioxide output, and HR were monitored, and VT was determined. The RPEVT was identified as the RPE estimated during the minute the VT occurred. V˙O2, percentage of maximal V˙O2 (%V˙O2max), and percentage of maximal HR (%HRmax) at the VT and RPEVT were compared among groups using analysis of variance. Obese women exhibited lower V˙O2 , %V˙O2max, and %HRmax at the VT than other groups, with no differences between normal and overweight women. However, RPEVT was similar among groups. In summary, RPEVT was approximately 12 in sedentary women, regardless of BMI classification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesf.2013.11.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VT may be a more sensitive measure of the high end of moderate exercise intensity than RPE.

    “it also suggests that VT may be a more sensitive measure of the high end of moderate exercise intensity than RPE (3,5,6,8,27).”

    From Ventilatory Threshold Related to VO2reserve, Heart Rate Reserve, and Rating of Perceived Exertion in a Large Varied Sample (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes VT as a physiological marker useful for prescribing exercise intensity. The Discussion (page unavailable) says RPE can identify intensity at VT and recommends it as a practical guide; it does not establish that VT is more sensitive than RPE at the high end of moderate intensity. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Robertson RJ. Exercise testing and prescription using RPE as a criterion variable. Int J Sport Psychol. 2001;32:177e188.

Authors
Elsangedy, H. M., Krinski, K., Costa, E. C., Haile, L., Fonteles, A. I., Timossi, L. D. S., & Gregorio da Silva, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (BR)
  • Lock Haven University (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Corresponding author
Elsangedy, Hassan Mohamed
Venue
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
102-106
ISSN
1728-869X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054447494
Cited by
21
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
rating of perceived exertion, ventilatory threshold, respiratory compensation point, body mass index, obesity, overweight, sedentary women, cardiorespiratory fitness, oxygen consumption, heart rate, treadmill exercise testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review