Cited by 98Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionEmotions and Moral BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Flies on the wall are less aggressive: Self-distancing “in the heat of the moment” reduces aggressive thoughts, angry feelings and aggressive behavior

Mischkowski, Dominik, Kross, Ethan, Bushman, Brad J.·2012·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 98

Authors
Mischkowski, D., Kross, E., & Bushman, B. J.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mischkowski, Dominik
  • Kross, Ethan
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
1187-1191
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990801670
Cited by
98
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
self-distancing, self-immersion, aggression, rumination, anger, aggressive thoughts, self-regulation, perspective taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review