False memories of fabricated political events
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Doctored photos can lead people to believe having witnessed fabricated news events that never occurred.
“A study of Frenda et al. (2013), which illustrated the persuasive power of visual media, showed that doctored photos can lead people to believe having witnessed fabricated news events that never occurred.”
From The detection of political deepfakes (2022) · cites this paper as Frenda et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 146
- Authors
- Frenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W., & Loftus, E. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frenda, Steven J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 280-286
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966505230
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- false memory, political events, political orientation, conservatives, liberals, source memory, familiarity, recognition, political attitudes, memory implantation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
