CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 75Behavioral Health and InterventionsPsychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Mental contrasting changes the meaning of reality

Kappes, Andreas, Wendt, Mike, Reinelt, Tilman, Oettingen, Gabriele·2013·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 75

Authors
Kappes, A., Wendt, M., Reinelt, T., & Oettingen, G.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Corresponding author
Kappes, Andreas
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
797-810
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.010
OpenAlex
W2072152924
Cited by
75
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
mental contrasting, goal pursuit, meaning of reality, barriers, expectancy of success, mediation, implicit categorization, explicit evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review