Using the bogus pipeline to investigate grandiose narcissism
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bogus pipeline studies have yielded mixed evidence: one found narcissistic women inflate their self-esteem, another found no evidence of inflation for narcissistic men or women.
“Results from these approaches have yielded mixed evidence; one study found that narcissistic women inflate their self-esteem (Myers & Zeigler-Hill 2012), whereas another found no evidence of inflation for narcissistic men or women (Brunell & Fisher 2014).”
From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Brunell & Fisher 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Brunell, A. B., & Fisher, T. D.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University at Mansfield (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brunell, Amy B.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 37-42
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003539021
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- grandiose narcissism, self-esteem, narcissistic grandiosity, narcissistic personality, psychological entitlement, reporting bias, anonymity, gender differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
