Americans overestimate social class mobility
Open accessAbstract
In this research we examine estimates of American social class mobility—the ability to move up or down in education and income status. Across studies, overestimates of class mobility were large and particularly likely among younger participants and those higher in subjective social class—both measured (Studies 1–3) and manipulated (Study 4). Class mobility overestimates were independent of general estimation errors (Study 3) and persisted after accounting for knowledge of class mobility assessed in terms of educational attainment and self-ratings. Experiments revealed that mobility overestimates were shaped by exposure to information about the genetic determinants of social class—a faux science article suggesting genetic constraints to economic advancement increased accuracy in class mobility estimates (Study 2)—and motivated by needs to protect the self—heightening the self-relevance of class mobility increased overestimates (Study 3). Discussion focused on both the costs and benefits of overestimates of class mobility for individuals and society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
American participants overestimate the degree of social mobility in the United States.
“American participants have been found to overestimate the degree of social mobility in the United States (Davidai & Gilovich, 2015; Kraus & Tan, 2015)”
From The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as Kraus & Tan, 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 63 · Cited by 297
- Authors
- Kraus, M. W., & Tan, J. J. X.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kraus, Michael W.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 101-111
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077208391
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 69.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- social mobility, overestimation, subjective social class, educational attainment, income level, genetic determinism, self-relevance, motivated reasoning, self-protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review