Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A theory of sticky rents: Search and bargaining with incomplete information

Gallin, Joshua, Verbrugge, Randal J.·2019·Journal of Economic Theory
DOI 10.1016/j.jet.2019.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jet.2019.06.003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Akerlof, 1970, The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Q. J. Econ., 84, 488, 10.2307/1879431 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Albrecht, 2006, Equilibrium directed search with multiple applications, Rev. Econ. Stud., 73, 869, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00400.x · DOI
  3. Ambrose, 2015, The repeat rent index, Rev. Econ. Stat., 97, 939, 10.1162/REST_a_00500 · DOI
  4. Aysoy, 2014, Quantifying and explaining stickiness in housing rents: a Turkish case study with micro-level data, J. Hous. Econ., 25, 62, 10.1016/j.jhe.2014.04.002 · DOI
  5. Ball, 1994, A sticky-price manifesto, Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy, 41, 127, 10.1016/0167-2231(94)00016-6 · DOI
  6. Barker, 2003, Length of residence discounts, turnover, and demand elasticity: should long-term tenants pay less than new tenants?, J. Hous. Econ., 12, 1, 10.1016/S1051-1377(03)00002-0 · DOI
  7. Bils, 1989, Pricing in a customer market, Q. J. Econ., 104, 699, 10.2307/2937863 · DOI
  8. Bils, 2004, Some evidence on the importance of sticky prices, J. Polit. Econ., 112, 947, 10.1086/422559 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Boivin, 2009, Sticky prices and monetary policy: evidence from disaggregated US data, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 350, 10.1257/aer.99.1.350 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Börgers, 2009, Efficient compromising, J. Econ. Theory, 144, 2057, 10.1016/j.jet.2009.01.011 · DOI
  11. Butters, 1977, Equilibrium distributions of sales and advertising sales, Rev. Econ. Stud., 44, 465, 10.2307/2296902 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Caballero, 1993, Heterogeneity and output fluctuations in a dynamic menu-cost economy, Rev. Econ. Stud., 60, 95, 10.2307/2297814 · DOI
  13. Camera, 2009, Price dispersion with directed search, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 7, 1193, 10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.6.1193 · DOI
  14. Chambers, 2009, The tax treatment of homeowners and landlords and the progressivity of income taxation, J. Monet. Econ., 56, 1023
  15. Cho, 1987, Signaling games and stable equilibria, Q. J. Econ., 102, 179, 10.2307/1885060 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Crone, 2010, Rents have been rising, not falling, in the postwar period, Rev. Econ. Stat., 92, 629, 10.1162/REST_a_00015 · DOI
  17. Curtis, 2004, Price setting, price dispersion, and the value of money; or, the law of two prices, J. Monet. Econ., 51, 1599, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2004.04.010 · DOI
  18. DiPasquale, 2011, Rental housing: current market conditions and the role of federal policy, J. Policy Dev. Res., Cityscape, 13, 57
  19. Eeckhout, 2010, Sorting versus screening: search frictions and competing mechanisms, J. Econ. Theory, 145, 1354, 10.1016/j.jet.2010.01.005 · DOI
  20. Geanakoplos, 2010, The leverage cycle, vol. 24, 1
  21. Genesove, 2003, The nominal rigidity of apartment rents, Rev. Econ. Stat., 85, 844, 10.1162/003465303772815763 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Gilboa, 2014, Economic models as analogies, Econ. J., 124, F513, 10.1111/ecoj.12128 · DOI
  23. Gibbard, 1977, Manipulation of voting schemes that mix voting with chance, Econometrica, 45, 665, 10.2307/1911681 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Golosov, 2007, Menu costs and Phillips curves, J. Polit. Econ., 115, 171, 10.1086/512625 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gopinath, 2011, In search of real rigidities, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2010, 25, 261, 10.1086/657540 · DOI
  26. Head, 2012, Sticky prices: a new monetarist approach, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 10, 939, 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01081.x · DOI
  27. Huang, 2014, Returns to scale, market power, and the nature of price rigidity in new Keynesian models with self-fulfiling expectations, J. Money Credit Bank., 46, 293, 10.1111/jmcb.12107 · DOI
  28. Kalai, 2013, Cooperation in strategic games revisited, Q. J. Econ., 128, 917, 10.1093/qje/qjs074 · DOI
  29. Kennan, 2010, Private information, wage bargaining and employment fluctuations, Rev. Econ. Stud., 77, 633, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00580.x · DOI
  30. Klenow, 2008, State-dependent or time-dependent pricing: does it matter for recent U.S. inflation?, Q. J. Econ., 123, 863, 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.863 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Knotek, 2011, Convenient prices and price rigidity: cross-sectional evidence, Rev. Econ. Stat., 93, 1076, 10.1162/REST_a_00124 · DOI
  32. Menzio, 2015, Equilibrium price dispersion with sequential search, J. Econ. Theory, 160, 188, 10.1016/j.jet.2015.09.004 · DOI
  33. Midrigan, 2011, Menu costs, multiproduct firms, and aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica, 79, 1139, 10.3982/ECTA6735 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Milgrom, 1982, Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: an equilibrium analysis, Econometrica, 50, 443, 10.2307/1912637 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Mills, 2019, Large-scale buy-to-rent investors in the single-family housing market: the emergence of a new asset class, Real Estate Econ., 47, 399, 10.1111/1540-6229.12189 · DOI
  36. Myerson, 1984, Two-person bargaining problems with incomplete information, Econometrica, 52, 461, 10.2307/1911499 · DOI
  37. Nakamura, 2008, Five facts about prices: a reevaluation of menu cost models, Q. J. Econ., 123, 1415, 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1415 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Nakamura, 2011, Price setting in forward-looking customer markets, J. Monet. Econ., 58, 220, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.06.004 · DOI
  39. Nelson, 1970, Information and consumer behavior, J. Polit. Econ., 78, 311, 10.1086/259630 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Randolph, 1988, Estimation of housing depreciation: short-term quality change and long-term vintage effects, J. Urban Econ., 23, 162, 10.1016/0094-1190(88)90012-5 · DOI
  41. Randolph, 1988, Housing depreciation and aging bias in the consumer price index, J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 6, 359, 10.1080/07350015.1988.10509673 · DOI
  42. Reingenaum, 1979, A simple model of equilibrium price dispersion, J. Polit. Econ., 87, 851, 10.1086/260796 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Shimizu, 2010, Residential rents and price rigidity: micro structure and macro consequences, J. Jpn. Int. Econ., 24, 282, 10.1016/j.jjie.2009.12.006 · DOI
  44. Sommers, 2013, The equilibrium effect of fundamentals on house prices and rents, J. Monet. Econ., 60, 854, 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.04.017 · DOI
  45. Stigler, 1961, The economics of information, J. Polit. Econ., 69, 213, 10.1086/258464 · DOI
  46. Verbrugge, 2017, Determinants of differential rent changes: mean reversion versus the usual suspects, Real Estate Econ., 45, 591, 10.1111/1540-6229.12145 · DOI

Cited by

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Gallin, J., & Verbrugge, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Economic Theory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
183
Pages
478-519
ISSN
0022-0531
DOI
10.1016/j.jet.2019.06.003
Cited by
36
References
0
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theory of sticky rents: Search and bargaining with incomplete information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jet.2019.06.003
The paper
Gallin, J., & Verbrugge, R. J. (2019). A theory of sticky rents: Search and bargaining with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2019.06.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.