The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The foundations of financial inclusion: Understanding ownership and use of formal accounts
Open accessAbstract
Financial inclusion -- defined here as the use of formal accounts -- can bring many welfare benefits to individuals. Yet the authors know very little about the factors underpinning financial inclusion across individuals and countries. Using data for 123 countries and over 124,000 individuals, this paper tries to understand the individual and country characteristics associated with the use of formal accounts and what policies are effective among those most likely to be excluded: the poor and rural residents. The authors find that greater ownership and use of accounts is associated with a better enabling environment for accessing financial services, such as lower account costs and greater proximity to financial intermediaries. Policies targeted to promote inclusion -- such as requiring banks to offer basic or low-fee accounts, exempting some depositors from onerous documentation requirements, allowing correspondent banking, and using bank accounts to make government payments -- may be especially effective among those most likely to be excluded. Finally, the study the factors associated with perceived barriers to account ownership among those who are financially excluded and find that these individuals report lower barriers in countries with lower costs of accounts and greater penetration of financial service providers. Overall, the results suggest that policies to reduce barriers to financial inclusion may expand the pool of eligible account users and encourage existing account holders to use their accounts with greater frequency and for the purpose of saving.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
Cited by
Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability
Ozili, P. K. (2018) · Borsa Istanbul Review · doi:10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003 · Cited by 2,133
On the Rise of FinTechs: Credit Scoring Using Digital Footprints
Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., & Puri, M. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz099 · Cited by 919
The determinants of financial inclusion in Africa
Zins, A., & Weill, L. (2016) · Review of Development Finance · doi:10.1016/j.rdf.2016.05.001 · Cited by 738
Does financial literacy improve financial inclusion? Cross country evidence
Grohmann, A., Klühs, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.020 · Cited by 699
Price Fluctuations and the Use of Bitcoin: An Empirical Inquiry
Polasik, M., Piotrowska, A. I., Wisniewski, T. P., Kotkowski, R., & Lightfoot, G. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1061413 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, F., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Martinez Peria, M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Financial Intermediation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 1-30
- ISSN
- 1042-9573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121287205
- Cited by
- 1,340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 105.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The foundations of financial inclusion: Understanding ownership and use of formal accounts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfi.2015.12.003
- The paper
- Allen, F., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Martinez Peria, M. S. (2016). The foundations of financial inclusion: Understanding ownership and use of formal accounts. Journal of Financial Intermediation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2015.12.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.