Cited by 23Poisoning and overdose treatmentsForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisHistorical and Scientific Studies

A retrospective study of poisoning deaths from forensic autopsy cases in northeast China (Liaoning)

Wang, Lin-Lin, Zhang, Miao, Zhang, Wei, Li, Bing-Xuan, Li, Ru-Bo, Zhu, Bao-Li, Wu, Xu, Guan, Da-Wei +2 more·2019·Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine

Abstract

Acute poisoning is a public health threat that leads to morbidity and mortality worldwide. In this retrospective study, we evaluated autopsies from deaths caused by acute poisoning from 2008 to 2017 at the School of Forensic Medicine, China Medical University (SFMCMU) in the Liaoning Province, northeast China. A total of 140 poisoning deaths were investigated and the demographic characteristics, causes and manner of death, toxics category were analyzed. The number of poisoning deaths gradually increased during the study period. The majority of poisoning deaths were accidents (66.43%), followed by suicides (27.86%), and homicides (3.57%). Of the 140 cases, 47 (33.57%) were caused by drugs, 38 (27.14%) by agrochemicals (mainly organophosphate pesticides, n = 16), 37 (26.43%) by respiratory dysfunction toxics (mainly carbon monoxide, n = 21), and 9 (6.43%) by poisonous plants and animals. Alcohol/methanol (5, 3.57%) and other chemicals (4, 2.86%) accounted for the remaining cases. The present study provides poisoning distribution in the Liaoning province and highlights implications for public health policy and prevention efforts in northeast China.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.02.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 23

Authors
Wang, L.-L., Zhang, M., Zhang, W., Li, B.-X., Li, R.-B., Zhu, B.-L., Wu, X., Guan, D.-W., Zhang, G.-H., & Zhao, R.
Affiliations
  • China Medical University (CN)
  • Criminal Investigation Police University of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Miao
  • Zhang, Wei
  • Zhao, Rui
Venue
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
63
Pages
7-10
ISSN
1752-928X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917454320
Cited by
23
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0807204)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81801874, 81772023, 81671862, 81871529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Historical and Scientific Studies
Keywords
forensic autopsy, drug overdose, organophosphorus pesticides, carbon monoxide poisoning, suicide, accidental poisoning, poisoning prevention, Liaoning Province
MeSH terms
Accidents, Blood Alcohol Content, Adolescent, Adult, Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Child, China, Female, Homicide, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Plants, Toxic, Poisoning, Respiratory Insufficiency, Retrospective Studies, Suicide, Agrochemicals, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Forensic Toxicology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review