Cited by 90Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdvanced Control Systems DesignNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization

Finite-interval quadratic polynomial inequalities and their application to time-delay systems

Park, JunMin, Park, PooGyeon·2020·Journal of the Franklin Institute

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.01.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, J., & Park, P.
Affiliations
Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, PooGyeon
Venue
Journal of the Franklin Institute
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
357
Issue
7
Pages
4316-4327
ISSN
0016-0032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004783006
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Franklin Institute (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2019R1A4A1029003)
  • Korea Electric Power Corporation (R18XA01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Keywords
time-delay systems, stability analysis, linear matrix inequalities, feasible region, tangent lines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review